Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1260147; said:USC doesn't do anything crazy... they know who they are... and they line up and play that brand of football... well. You think Ohio State should be different? If I could have one difference it would be this:
USC's scheme wasn't better than Ohio State's really.. what was better was USC's relentlessness.
USC's players weren't better than Ohio State's really... what was better was the fact that they truly play each second of each down as if it was their last play on earth. And if it's 50 to nothing, they don't care.. they play each and every play like it matters.
THATS what I'd like to see the staff teach the Buckeyes. If OSU learns nothing else from this trip out west, I hope it's that... What USC showed wasn't better because of some kind of magic. It's better because they play with intensity and urgency and relentlessness. ALL the time.
I agree and whats even worse. JL,Beanie and Jenkins are the only 3 buckeyes that would start for USC. Talent difference and coaching stood out badly :(RhodeIslandBuck;1260151; said:I really feel bad for JL, he came back his senior year for a NC and he played his ass off last night, but his teammates didn't pull through for him. I'm really gonna miss him after he graduates, you don;t find players like him very often.
O Nasty;1260057; said:All that is just another way of running the ball, Pryor shouldn't have been rotating every other play once he got in the groove of things....If your going to use him, Let him go on the 3rd downs...Not 2nd...What sense does that make?
And they might have been better, But there's no way in hell we should of gotten dominated like that.
tibor75;1260188; said:Basically, I don't think the talent level is there to justify thinking this team is top 5. If you compare this team to 2002, there is no comparison. None. From every position, this team suffers in comparison to 2002.
I think TB should deserve some slack. On his best day, against average competition, he looks like Krenzel. On his worst day, against elite teams, he looks like Bellisari. What does this mean? Probably that as a QB, he is better than Bellisari, but not as good as Krenzel. TB could possibily be a NC winning QB, if he had a great OL and great WRs. But nobody on this team reminds me of Michael Jenkins. And I have no idea why this OL is not up to par with OSU's OL of the past. That is the most baffling part.
Jaxbuck;1260202; said:agree 100%
How amusing are those poll threads comparing the 2002 units to the 2008 units now?
ysubuck;1260211; said:If we are talking about strictly talent then I think you can compare them. That's where it ends. They need to be coached up and they need to be in a street fight on every play. Particularly the D line. Look at the DTs from 2002. Tim Anderson didn't get drafted and K Peterson went in the 4th round I believe. Yet they were kicking people's asses on every play. Heart and desire and that's helped by coaching.
ysubuck;1260211; said:If we are talking about strictly talent then I think you can compare them. That's where it ends. They need to be coached up and they need to be in a street fight on every play. Particularly the D line. Look at the DTs from 2002. Tim Anderson didn't get drafted and K Peterson went in the 4th round I believe. Yet they were kicking people's asses on every play. Heart and desire and that's helped by coaching.
Taosman;1260225; said:Like Tressel says; "This is only September. There is a ton of football left to play!" Get healthy Beanie, we need you!
tibor75;1260188; said:Basically, I don't think the talent level is there to justify thinking this team is top 5. If you compare this team to 2002, there is no comparison. None. From every position, this team suffers in comparison to 2002.
I think TB should deserve some slack. On his best day, against average competition, he looks like Krenzel. On his worst day, against elite teams, he looks like Bellisari. What does this mean? Probably that as a QB, he is better than Bellisari, but not as good as Krenzel. TB could possibily be a NC winning QB, if he had a great OL and great WRs. But nobody on this team reminds me of Michael Jenkins. And I have no idea why this OL is not up to par with OSU's OL of the past. That is the most baffling part.
lvbuckeye;1260231; said:September is for pretenders. and we were exposed as pretenders.
oh, and when asked about national perception, Tressel also said, "Taking a lot of heat from whom? I guess I?m only concerned with Ohio State fans."
well, this is one Ohio State fan who's less than pleased with the product.