buckeyegrad;743030; said:
Who claims this? There is zero indication from the Gospels that Jesus was annointed by oils before his baptism by water. To suggest otherwise is mere fabrication. Of course there were other times Jesus was annointed by oils/perfumes by women, but those time are not related to his baptism.
Do you actually believe this crap? I am seriously asking this because you claim to be a Christian (at least I think you do--please correct if wrong), and although I hate questioning someone elses standing with Christ, I will stand up against heresey and lies added to the Word of God. Needless to say, none of what is stated here can be supported by Scripture and reeks of someone trying to corrupt writings which are "God breathed" into a new religion--reminds me a lot of the gnostics of the first couple of centuries.
As I stated, anything related to being "high" as the the result of a drug-induced experience is considered sorcery and living in the flesh according to the writings of Paul and John.
The rest of mankind that were not killed by these plagues still did not repent of the work of their hands; they did not stop worshiping demons, and idols of gold, silver, bronze, stone and wood?idols that cannot see or hear or walk. Nor did they repent of their murders, their magic arts, their sexual immorality or their thefts. (Revelation 9:20-21)
The acts of the sinful nature are obvious: sexual immorality, impurity and debauchery; idolatry and witchcraft; hatred, discord, jealousy, fits of rage, selfish ambition, dissensions, factions and envy; drunkenness, orgies, and the like. (Galatians 5:19-21a)
In the original Greek, the two highlighted words in these passages is pharmakeia. It should look familiar to everyone as it is where we derive the word pharmacy and it means the use or administration of drugs. Hence it seem pretty clear that using any type of drug, whether it be cannibus or something else, to achieve a "spiritual" experience is considered a sinful act against God.
Do i believe the crap you quoted me on.. no, i dont. i dont think Christ tripped. I do think marijuana could have easily been an incent. Marijuana was the first plant to grow on King Sauls grave as far as I know too, you may be able to correct me but as far as I know it was.
I think that marijuana is a special plant.. i do. the things it can do, outside of fucking people up, is incredible.. perhaps this plant could help usher in peace.. perhaps it's the tree of life, perhaps its the sage plant that allowed us to connect to God in the first place, perhaps its manna, and perhaps its the tree of knowledge.. perhaps a 100 diffrent things.. including perhaps its just a plant.
the Holy Annoting Oil, the ingredients coming straight from God Himself to Moses.. contained marijuana, which is outlawed today for what reason exactly?
Luke 3:16: I indeed baptize you with water; but one mightier than I cometh, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to unloose; he shall Baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with Fire.
^This to me means that God baptised Christ, not an earthly oil or water. But why would Christ need to be baptised with the Spirit.. considering he is the Spirit?
There are other metions of the Fire Baptism and these are some of things Gnostics said we're revealed to them by Christ after His death, which Christ said he would do. The story line, as far as i can see, is when you're ready to have a better understanding of whats being taught, you can advance to more teachings.. thats why the Bible is composed the way it is and why Christ taught in parables, so we can understand.
Todays times, are a time of revelation.. and this is one of those things I believe.
Christ drank wine, no?
It is definatly not clear that using cannabis for spirtual reasons is a sinful act. God mandated cannabis be used in one of the most spirtual ways.
Not trying to add lies to the word of God.. just discussing possibilities.