• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Official 2006 NCAA Tournament Discussion Thread

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
crazybuckfan40 said:
I didnt get to watch the game, but from watching on yahoo it looked like the fouls were not even at all.

Was Cuse' fighitng an uphill battle against he Refs.
Click to expand...
Man...seems like it's ALWAYS the refs. It's amazing how officiating is always horrible. And if the fouls aren't even, it's the officials fault. I think we need to get rid of the refs and just play on an honor system.

Oh and by the way, in case I haven't let everybody know in awhile:

OHIO STATE WILL BE A #1 SEED
 
Upvote 0
indianacane02 said:
Because our resume is much more impressive. We actually beat better teams on the road. Just because you beat us 2 out of 3 doesn't mean you're a tourney team. We've beaten Marquette, Syracuse, and Vanderbilt (who had a 22 game home winning streak at the time) all on the road. We also beat LSU on a neutral court basically without 1 starter who injured his shoulder in the first 5 minutes of the game.

SU, on the other hand, lost by 39 at DePaul, and has won 4 of their last 13 which is much worse than UC's. Don't tell me the committee will say that a 1 point loss doesn't mean any different than a 39 point loss to DePaul.

As for the whole situation, I feel very comfortable that UC is in. SU is squarely on the bubble though, but I would probably say they're in unless they get blown off the court against UConn then you might have another problem.
Click to expand...
still feelin comfy?
 
Upvote 0
JonathanXC said:
I've been saying it a couple weeks...i'm gonna stick with it. At least you all don't think i'm as nuts as you did when I first said it.
Click to expand...

The board's perception of your sanity has never hinged on this particular assertion. We've known that you're nuts for a long time, pal.
 
Upvote 0
crazybuckfan40 said:
I didnt get to watch the game, but from watching on yahoo it looked like the fouls were not even at all.

Was Cuse' fighitng an uphill battle against he Refs.
Click to expand...
It wasn't horrible. The only problem I had was the 5th foul on Roberts. That was awful. Other than that it was a very good job by the refs.

A team like Syracuse has to foul a lot more than a team like UConn to win.
 
Upvote 0
JonathanXC said:
Man...seems like it's ALWAYS the refs. It's amazing how officiating is always horrible. And if the fouls aren't even, it's the officials fault. I think we need to get rid of the refs and just play on an honor system.

Oh and by the way, in case I haven't let everybody know in awhile:

OHIO STATE WILL BE A #1 SEED
Click to expand...

I said I didnt see the game, I was just questioning if it was good or bad.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top