Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Plus, unlike college, the NFL doesn’t like to override the field call unless it’s obvious.Yes, I thought the interception call was correct - the WR needs to keep that ball secured and he did not. Not on Allen. But those 2 PI calls were not consistent with the contact the refs were allowing both sides to commit leading up to that drive. And that is the most inappropriate time in a game to make that change.
Depends it seems. They have over ruled in other cases.Plus, unlike college, the NFL doesn’t like to override the field call unless it’s obvious.
my understanding of football at every level is if the attempt is made while in the air, the ball must be secured through the ground. He hit the ground, his hands left the ball, therefore he lost possession...... It just happened that he lost possession into someone else's hands, and not to the ground.When his knee hits or his body?
I agree the PI calls were not that consistant at the end, but blatantly tackling a guy who's beaten you by 5 yards for the game winning TD HAS to be called. The first one was the iffy one, for sure, but it happened on the same play with the late hit to the QB, and thus becomes a moot point, anyway.Yes, I thought the interception call was correct - the WR needs to keep that ball secured and he did not. Not on Allen. But those 2 PI calls were not consistent with the contact the refs were allowing both sides to commit leading up to that drive. And that is the most inappropriate time in a game to make that change.
my understanding of football at every level is if the attempt is made while in the air, the ball must be secured through the ground. He hit the ground, his hands left the ball, therefore he lost possession...... It just happened that he lost possession into someone else's hands, and not to the ground.
Yeah and did he make a football move and did he take two steps and ……my understanding of football at every level is if the attempt is made while in the air, the ball must be secured through the ground. He hit the ground, his hands left the ball, therefore he lost possession...... It just happened that he lost possession into someone else's hands, and not to the ground.
I don't recall the leadup to that play, and the refs weren't flagging anything that wasn't that blatant up to that point, but if the db makes contact playing the ball, then that's typically allowed anyway. He came away with the pick, so it's not like he wasn't playing the ball.Im not disagreeing with that, my beef as a fan was Denver db made as much contact before ball arrived as buff dbs did on ensuing possession
Fucking JJ fumbled the ball out of the endzone. Vulverines ball and 10 extra points!Yeah and did he make a football move and did he take two steps and ……
He didn’t make the pick playing the ball though. There was no more or less contact on the 2 PIs called on Denver’s last drive.I don't recall the leadup to that play, and the refs weren't flagging anything that wasn't that blatant up to that point, but if the db makes contact playing the ball, then that's typically allowed anyway. He came away with the pick, so it's not like he wasn't playing the ball.
I've stated numerous times that the first Bills PI was the one I'd argue went against what they'd done all game to that point, but since the roughing the passer also occurred on that play, it was still going to be a first down and set up the rest. The 2nd PI had to be called. Dude was beat and tackled the receiver to prevent the game winning TD. Tackling a guy who beats you is a penalty in every sport, and leads to a penalty shot/kick in a few of them.
Trying to follow the logic.... He wasn't playing the ball, but ended up with the ball? Isn't ending up with the ball the very definition of playing the ball?He didn’t make the pick playing the ball though. There was no more or less contact on the 2 PIs called on Denver’s last drive.
He was laying on top of him on the ground and pulled the ball outTrying to follow the logic.... He wasn't playing the ball, but ended up with the ball? Isn't ending up with the ball the very definition of playing the ball?