• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

NFL Discussion (Official Thread)

Don't worry, they reviewed it and decided they were right.
So yesterday I saw at least 2 calls that weren't very conclusive get overturned due to some phantom INDISPUTABLE evidence. Today I see a call where the player is clearly kneeling with the ball on the 41 (not saying the BALL was on the 41, but the player was) and they decided that, no the ball was definitely at the 42.
To be clear here. I still think the ball was likely an inch or two short of the needed mark (the 41), thanks to his body being in the way. But to just declare, no the ball is at the 42 after review is complete ass.
 
Upvote 0
So yesterday I saw at least 2 calls that weren't very conclusive get overturned due to some phantom INDISPUTABLE evidence. Today I see a call where the player is clearly kneeling with the ball on the 41 (not saying the BALL was on the 41, but the player was) and they decided that, no the ball was definitely at the 42.
To be clear here. I still think the ball was likely an inch or two short of the needed mark (the 41), thanks to his body being in the way. But to just declare, no the ball is at the 42 after review is complete ass.
Spots are the worst. Cause a lot of the time they are clearly wrong even if it's not a 1st down but they only seem to care if it's a 1st down on the review not getting the spot right, Now I think he was likely still short but yeah it shoiuld have been measuring disctance
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top