• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

NFL Discussion (Official Thread)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
BuckeyeNation27 said:
Don't worry, they reviewed it and decided they were right.
Click to expand...
So yesterday I saw at least 2 calls that weren't very conclusive get overturned due to some phantom INDISPUTABLE evidence. Today I see a call where the player is clearly kneeling with the ball on the 41 (not saying the BALL was on the 41, but the player was) and they decided that, no the ball was definitely at the 42.
To be clear here. I still think the ball was likely an inch or two short of the needed mark (the 41), thanks to his body being in the way. But to just declare, no the ball is at the 42 after review is complete ass.
 
Upvote 0
Gizmo said:
So yesterday I saw at least 2 calls that weren't very conclusive get overturned due to some phantom INDISPUTABLE evidence. Today I see a call where the player is clearly kneeling with the ball on the 41 (not saying the BALL was on the 41, but the player was) and they decided that, no the ball was definitely at the 42.
To be clear here. I still think the ball was likely an inch or two short of the needed mark (the 41), thanks to his body being in the way. But to just declare, no the ball is at the 42 after review is complete ass.
Click to expand...
Spots are the worst. Cause a lot of the time they are clearly wrong even if it's not a 1st down but they only seem to care if it's a 1st down on the review not getting the spot right, Now I think he was likely still short but yeah it shoiuld have been measuring disctance
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top