• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.
I've never been up for a College Football Playoff. There is no way that I could see the NCAA doing so without killing bowl games.

I think I have an idea that not only would allow us to crown a true National Champion, but will keep bowl games just as healthy as they have ever been!

First off: All independent teams must join a conference our forfeit a BCS birth.

All conferences would be assigned 3 other conferences that they must play in addition to their normal conference schedule. Example: Each team in the Big 10 must play 1 opponent in the SEC, Big 12 and Pac 10 in addition to their conference schedule. Each SEC team must play 1 opponent in the Big 10, ACC and Big East. Each Pac 10 team needs to play 1 opponent in the Big 10, WAC and Big 12...etc. etc.

By doing this and not allowing teams to schedule weaker teams for their OOC games would allow fans, the media and voters to get a good idea of who the best teams in the country are and what conferences are elite.

The conference debate would be over due to teams playing "meaningful" games outside the conference. We would be able to accurately measure up conferences since they played against a team that play against another conference. I know we don't live in a perfect world where just because one team beats a team, and we beat the team that beat that team, automatically means we would beat both teams...but at least it gives us a better idea of who the best teams in the country are.

I hate to use the Buckeyes in a bad example, but wouldn't you (a non-bias fan) have liked to see the Buckeyes against a great team outside the Big 10 last year?

Or how Texas Tech would do outside of the Big 12?

I don't think it's fair that one team is willing to go outside the conference and play good competition for their OOC opponent, while another is willing to take a Div. II school and pick up an easy win. With this plan, the NCAA could get by without a tournament, but still crown a legit National Champion while only adding a game or two to the schedule.... and 1 or 2 good football games at that!

Just a thought...
 
Chair of BCS committee not on board with Obama's playoff idea

One person who won't be swayed by President-elect Barack Obama's recent call for an eight-team national college football playoff is Oregon president David Frohnmayer, chair of the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee.
"We deeply respect the president-elect and we are glad that he is a fan of college football," Frohnmayer said in an e-mail response to ESPN Tuesday. "We have the most compelling regular season in all of sports, and I'm sure that contributes to Senator Obama's enjoyment of our great game."

Frohnmayer opposes a playoff for the former Division I-A. Other presidents on the committee are Rev. John Jenkins (Notre Dame), Robert Khayat (Ole Miss), Mark Nordenberg (Pittsburgh), John Peters (Northern Illinois), Harvey Perlman (Nebraska), Graham Spanier (Penn State) and Charles Steger (Virginia Tech.)

"My colleagues and I on the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee have discussed the future of postseason football on many occasions and we do not believe a playoff would be in the best interest of the sport, the student-athletes or our many other constituencies," Frohnmayer said.

Entire article: ESPN - BCS committee doesn't like Obama's playoff plan
 
Upvote 0
ScriptOhio;1322778; said:
One person who won't be swayed by President-elect Barack Obama's recent call for an eight-team national college football playoff is Oregon president David Frohnmayer, chair of the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee.
"We deeply respect the president-elect and we are glad that he is a fan of college football," Frohnmayer said in an e-mail response to ESPN Tuesday. "We have the most compelling regular season in all of sports, and I'm sure that contributes to Senator Obama's enjoyment of our great game."

Frohnmayer opposes a playoff for the former Division I-A. Other presidents on the committee are Rev. John Jenkins (Notre Dame), Robert Khayat (Ole Miss), Mark Nordenberg (Pittsburgh), John Peters (Northern Illinois), Harvey Perlman (Nebraska), Graham Spanier (Penn State) and Charles Steger (Virginia Tech.)

"My colleagues and I on the BCS Presidential Oversight Committee have discussed the future of postseason football on many occasions and we do not believe a playoff would be in the best interest of the sport, the student-athletes or our many other constituencies," Frohnmayer said.

Entire article: ESPN - BCS committee doesn't like Obama's playoff plan


We'll see him sing a different tune when Obama orders in the troops. :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
I don't buy the whole "8 team playoff would ruin the regular season" talk. Think about it for a second. Penn State lost and dropped to 8th. Almost dropped out of it entirely. And in an 8 team playoff system, if the first round was a home game for the higher seed, then finishing in the top 4 would be HUGE! A late loss would pretty much kill your chances of that, just like they kill your chances now of being in the top 2. It wouldn't make the regular season that much different. It would make some regular season much more exciting. How exciting would it be for OSU right now? We'd be holding our breath, hoping to win out and somehow make the top 8. It'd be fun as hell.

The 4 losers in the first round go to "BCS bowl games" to play each other. So like, Orange and Fiesta.

Then the other two BCS bowl games are the semifinals.

And then the final would be the NCG just like it is now, at one of the sights a week later.

The rest of the teams not in the top 8, go to other bowls. The only difference is the bowls would have more meaning. And the NCG teams would have already played in a bowl. Six schools would have one extra game a year than they would under the current system...and two would have 2 extra games.

The money is still there. The 4 BCS bowl games and the NCG would sell out. The other bowl games would be just as important as they are now, which is all about pride and winning that bowl game. (Yay, we are GMAC Bowl Champions!)

There is just as much money in it this way, maybe more because of the extra home game for four teams, as there would be in any other system. You could even jack up the price if you wanted on the face value if your worried about money. I mean...who here wouldn't have paid $120 face last year after the regular season was over to see #8 Kansas (11-1) at #1 Ohio State (11-1)

I mean look at these awesome end of season games last year.

#8 Kansas (11-1) at #1 Ohio State (11-1) Noon
#7 USC (10-2) at #2 LSU (11-2) 3:30pm
#6 Missouri (11-2) at #3 Virginia Tech (11-2) 7:00pm
#5 Georgia (10-2) at #4 Oklahoma (11-2) 10:30pm

How sweet would those games be? Those four stadiums would be jammed no matter what the price of the tickets. In a winner moves on style, the whole country would be glued to their TV watching these games. Imagine it being called SUPER SATURDAY. With games at Noon, 3:30, 7:00 and 10:30. Sure 10:30 is a little late on the East Coast, but it's a Saturday, and you'd just give that time slot to the team furthest West, or in this case Oklahoma. SUPER SATURDAY would become the greatest day in college sports, I feel. If this particular super saturday doesn't get you pumped up, look at some of the others that could have been, with OSU included.

2006:

#6 Louisville (11-1) at #3 Michigan (11-1) Noon
#8 Boise State (12-0) at #1 Ohio State (12-0) 3:30pm
#7 Wisconsin (11-1) at #2 Florida (12-1) 7:00pm
#5 USC (10-2) at #4 LSU (10-2) 10:30pm

2005:

#6 Norte Dame (9-2) at #3 Penn State (10-1) Noon
#5 Oregon (10-1) at #4 Ohio State (9-2) 3:30pm
#7 Georgia (10-2) at #2 Texas (12-0) 7:00pm
#8 Miami (FL) (9-2) at #1 USC (12-0) 10:30pm

2003:

#5 Ohio State (10-2) at #4 Michigan (10-2) Noon (interesting rematch...i'm sure this game wouldn't have been boring)
#7 Florida State (10-2) at #2 LSU (11-1) 3:30pm
#8 Tennessee (10-2) at #1 Oklahoma (12-0) 7:00pm
#6 Texas (10-2) at #3 USC (10-1) 10:30pm

2002:

#8 Kansas State (10-2) at #1 Miami (FL) (11-0) Noon
#7 Oklahoma (10-2) at #2 Ohio State (13-0) 3:30pm
#6 Washington State (9-2) at #3 Georgia (11-1) 7:00pm
#5 Iowa (11-1) at #4 USC (10-2) 10:30pm

1998:

#8 Florida (9-2) at #1 Tennessee (12-0) Noon
#5 UCLA (10-1) at #4 Ohio State (10-1) 3:30pm
#7 Arizona (11-1) at #2 Florida State (11-1) 7:00pm
#6 Texas A&M (11-2) at #3 Kansas State (11-1) 10:30pm


Sure sometimes there are rematches, but this time you know exactly what is on the line. And likely the first game did matter, becuase the loser of the first game between those two teams is probably going to be on the road in the rematch...so it definitely doesn't make the first game irrelivant. How awesome would these Saturday's have been? Is there any game listed there that wouldn't have been a huge ticket and TV draw? Plus mid-majors...those teams that never have a shot at winning the title would be given a shot like Boise State, Louisville, and Notre Dame.

I'm sure it would have changed outcomes of national championships, but it would likely be more fair. I just don't understand what this would take away from the bowls, from the money gained by the NCAA and Bowls and TV, or from the fans/players.

Super Saturday. Just think about it. Super Saturday would be so big. And then once it is done. You still have the semi finals and finals i the bowl games. As well as a couple other BCS bowls matching top 10 teams against each other. In 2007 and 2005 and 1998, we likely would have known had we not beaten Michigan, we would not get into Super Saturday. (Granted we went up a lot in 2007 after the Michigan game, but at the time, it sure would have felt like a MUST WIN to get into Super Saturday.) It would only add to The Game. In 2003 and 2002 The Game would decide whether we get a home game on Super Saturday or not. How interesting would have 2005 been. We play them again, but have to go back to Ann Arbor since we lost the game before. I mean maybe that would have pissed some fans off. But could it piss anyone off as much as the BCS pisses off teams EVERY year?

THIS SHOULD BE THE NEW BCS SYSTEM! Write your congressman. Write President-Elect Obama. Let's get it done.
 
Upvote 0
Why have an 8 game playoff when right now every team has a 12 game playoff?

A Playoff rewards the 'Hot' team, not the 'Best' team. For whatever reason, college fans seem to want their champion to be recognized as the BEST, and not just the one that happened to win a few games in a row at the end of the year.

The New York Giants.... clearly NOT the best team in the NFL last year.
Colorado Rockies.... clearly NOT the best team in the NL last year.

The list goes on.
 
Upvote 0
Why have an 8 game playoff when right now every team has a 12 game playoff?

A Playoff rewards the 'Hot' team, not the 'Best' team. For whatever reason, college fans seem to want their champion to be recognized as the BEST, and not just the one that happened to win a few games in a row at the end of the year.

The New York Giants.... clearly NOT the best team in the NFL last year.
Colorado Rockies.... clearly NOT the best team in the NL last year.

The list goes on.

First of all there wouldn't be an 8-5 team that gets an invite. Last years final AP.

RankTeamRecordPoints
1Alabama (59)13-11475
2Oregon12-11358
3Ohio State12-01302
4Notre Dame12-11288
5Georgia12-21230
5Texas A&M11-21230
7Stanford12-21169
8South Carolina11-21038
9Florida11-2933
10Florida State12-2922
11Clemson11-2889
12Kansas State11-2871
13Louisville11-2781

Secondly as a Buckeye fan I'd much prefer a 8 team playoff with a possible home game than waiting close to 40-50 days just to go play in someone else's backyard for a title. The last time I remember seeing the 2 best teams in college football actually show up after a long layoff was in 2002.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top