• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

NCAA2010 PS3 BP Online Dynasty

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
FINALLY updated Post #2 & #3

Results & Awards/All-Americans have been posted. Once recruiting is done will update post #4.

Took ECU & Minnesota out since they barely (ok, ECU has never played) played this season.

Lot more All-Americans this year than last.
 
Upvote 0
Does anyone know how promising playing time works this year? I just beat UCF for a power running back by [strike]buying his parents a new house[/strike] showcasing Army's engineering program. I threw in this promise.
 
Upvote 0
Smooth Olaf;1616943; said:
Does anyone know how promising playing time works this year? I just beat UCF for a power running back by [strike]buying his parents a new house[/strike] showcasing Army's engineering program. I threw in this promise.
Click to expand...

Promising Playing time means he HAS to be your starting RB. Listed #1 on the depth chart. Or else a high chance he will want to transfer.

Basebuck;1616933; said:
Are you serious. How did that happen? You usually dont do that well. :wink2:
Click to expand...

THEWOOD;1616988; said:
You jumped both Big12 schools? How in the hell did that shit happen? I demand an investigation!
Click to expand...

:p Finally, a 5 star recruit didn't go to either of the Big XII schools. I was beginning to wonder if you guys were cheating or something :paranoid:
 
Upvote 0
He doesn't have to be #1 on your depth chart. The equation for "satisfaction" involves a few different factors, including statistics, depth chart position, and if the player(s) ahead are seniors. So if he's number 2 on your depth chart, but has 1100 yards and 8 touchdowns, he'll likely stay. To make sure one thing you can do is put the promised player as a starter and then sub him out during the game. BUT, then you won't be fully satisfying the player in terms of p.t. (statistics).
 
Upvote 0
Merih;1617036; said:
He doesn't have to be #1 on your depth chart. The equation for "satisfaction" involves a few different factors, including statistics, depth chart position, and if the player(s) ahead are seniors. So if he's number 2 on your depth chart, but has 1100 yards and 8 touchdowns, he'll likely stay. To make sure one thing you can do is put the promised player as a starter and then sub him out during the game. BUT, then you won't be fully satisfying the player in terms of p.t. (statistics).
Click to expand...

My plan was to just use him in short yardage situations. His SPD is an 85 and he has pretty good power ratings.
 
Upvote 0
FYI - We did advance last night to Position Changes.


Merih;1617036; said:
He doesn't have to be #1 on your depth chart. The equation for "satisfaction" involves a few different factors, including statistics, depth chart position, and if the player(s) ahead are seniors. So if he's number 2 on your depth chart, but has 1100 yards and 8 touchdowns, he'll likely stay. To make sure one thing you can do is put the promised player as a starter and then sub him out during the game. BUT, then you won't be fully satisfying the player in terms of p.t. (statistics).
Click to expand...

They actually changed that from last year? I didn't think they did.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top