• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

NCAA09 PS3 BP Online Dynasty

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Ok, seems like most everyone is done and the last straggler will get done early in the evening (Wood, you are getting your stuff done this afternoon, right? Or you done already)

So looks like we will advance to cuts around 7-8pm et
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;1449550; said:
They disappear. It would be a neat feature to add transfers after cuts. Kids would transfer close to home or to their previous favorites.
Click to expand...

Yeah, that would be so cool. Or better yet the game is tighter on how many you can sign in the first place. So if you only have 10 seniors, you only have 10 scholarships til you know whether there are any transfers/early entrants.
 
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1449565; said:
85 man rosters
Click to expand...

While that would be great, 70 is a nice balance. Not like recruits bomb out and become busts. So 70 is fine by me.

What would be better is more room on the depth chart for WRs and CBs. 6 WRs and only 5 CBs? With the amount of 4 wide sets and dime packages, you are kinda thin on those depth charts.
 
Upvote 0
Piney;1449571; said:
While that would be great, 70 is a nice balance. Not like recruits bomb out and become busts. So 70 is fine by me.

What would be better is more room on the depth chart for WRs and CBs. 6 WRs and only 5 CBs? With the amount of 4 wide sets and dime packages, you are kinda thin on those depth charts.
Click to expand...
4* recruits in the low 70's, and 3* recruits in the low 60's aren't "busts"? I want 85 man rosters AND better depth charts. I want 12 offensive lineman on my team, and 12 defensive lineman on my team. I want to be able to have 210 pound LBs that can fly. Whose sole purpose is playing on punt and kick coverage teams, and not have them clog up my LB depth chart.

I'm greedy. I know. Don't care. Give it to me.
 
Upvote 0
Didn't see that coming. I still had to cut a 5*HB. He was a 78 OVR JUCO Jr, but I have no idea how he was rated that high. It must've been his 75 AWR, because he only had 88 speed, wasn't very strong, couldn't catch, carry, juke, spin, stiff arm, or block. What a waste of space.
 
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1449982; said:
Didn't see that coming. I still had to cut a 5*HB. He was a 78 OVR JUCO Jr, but I have no idea how he was rated that high. It must've been his 75 AWR, because he only had 88 speed, wasn't very strong, couldn't catch, carry, juke, spin, stiff arm, or block. What a waste of space.
Click to expand...

I had to cut several former 5*'s in favor of some 3 and 4*'s that have developed better.

I just finished my stuff up and only WOOD, Buchtel, BN27, and MSJ left.
 
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1449982; said:
Didn't see that coming. I still had to cut a 5*HB. He was a 78 OVR JUCO Jr, but I have no idea how he was rated that high. It must've been his 75 AWR, because he only had 88 speed, wasn't very strong, couldn't catch, carry, juke, spin, stiff arm, or block. What a waste of space.
Click to expand...

In my offline dynasty with Ohio State, I once recruited the #1 WR who ended up with 80 SPD and 81 ACC. He was one of those guys who committed on the spot in the first week of recruiting. I didn't even bother to look at his ratings when I offered since I figured the #1 WR would be, you know, not terrible.

He did have 97 JMP though so he had that going for him. He ended up getting cut.
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top