• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

NCAA09 PS3 BP Online Dynasty

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
Bleed S & G;1216898; said:
So we can play tonight?
Click to expand...

sparky was online in our dynasty about 90 minutes ago. So I left, grilled up dinner and now just relaxing in my office.

I'll be on my PS3 in 20-30 minutes to see if Sparky finished up and I will advance it.

So short answer... I am pretty sure you can play your game sometime tonight :biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
Piney;1217006; said:
sparky was online in our dynasty about 90 minutes ago. So I left, grilled up dinner and now just relaxing in my office.

I'll be on my PS3 in 20-30 minutes to see if Sparky finished up and I will advance it.

So short answer... I am pretty sure you can play your game sometime tonight :biggrin:
Click to expand...
Niiiiiccceee
 
Upvote 0
Piney;1216707; said:
reworking the schedule as we speak... have the new updated schedule for this year coming up.

I will have to rework the future schedules, but that doesn't affect the 'now'
Click to expand...

Future schedules seem to be interesting now. Originally we wanted 2 non-conference human games per team. Since we had 3 teams in the Big 12 we gave them a break. With the addition of Air Force it looks like alot of people might be playing 3-4 human games a season.

So, before I get too far into the future schedules I figured I should put this up for a vote.

Option #1 - Leave it as it is - Meaning very little will be done to rework the future schedules. ie Air Force will replace Washington in future schedules. The result? Army will be playing 3 human games a year and Air Force will be playing 3-4 human games a year and BYU will be playing 3 human games a year. Also the Big 12 will have the same schedule as it has now.

Option #2 - Pair everyone up - Kentucky & Michigan State are the only 2 teams that don't have a forced human game on an annual basis. So they become an annual game and then everyone else just plays one human non-conference game. * Also SMU & ECU do not play every year and then every other year Colorado does not play a human conference game. So I can rotate them in with Kentucky & MSU for those 5 teams to play each other on a more regular basis than everyone else. Only down side is it might take a while to play everyone in the dynasty, but hopefully bowl games take care of that.

Just wanted to get people's feedback on this to see if we don't mind alot of human games, or we should cut them down since there will be more conference human games than we initially thought so we can make sure the seasons move faster.
 
Upvote 0
Piney;1217681; said:
Future schedules seem to be interesting now. Originally we wanted 2 non-conference human games per team. Since we had 3 teams in the Big 12 we gave them a break. With the addition of Air Force it looks like alot of people might be playing 3-4 human games a season.

So, before I get too far into the future schedules I figured I should put this up for a vote.

Option #1 - Leave it as it is - Meaning very little will be done to rework the future schedules. ie Air Force will replace Washington in future schedules. The result? Army will be playing 3 human games a year and Air Force will be playing 3-4 human games a year and BYU will be playing 3 human games a year. Also the Big 12 will have the same schedule as it has now.

Option #2 - Pair everyone up - Kentucky & Michigan State are the only 2 teams that don't have a forced human game on an annual basis. So they become an annual game and then everyone else just plays one human non-conference game. * Also SMU & ECU do not play every year and then every other year Colorado does not play a human conference game. So I can rotate them in with Kentucky & MSU for those 5 teams to play each other on a more regular basis than everyone else. Only down side is it might take a while to play everyone in the dynasty, but hopefully bowl games take care of that.

Just wanted to get people's feedback on this to see if we don't mind alot of human games, or we should cut them down since there will be more conference human games than we initially thought so we can make sure the seasons move faster.
Click to expand...
I agree with having UK(me) and MSU paired up every year. As for SMU, ECU, and Colorado. If the players are any good, then they will run through their divisions and play a forced human game every year in the conference championship. If they're not any good, then they'll need the break of not playing more than one human player every year.

My input doesn't help you though because it is neither option 1 or 2. If I'm forced to vote between the two choices, then I'd say that we go with option #2
 
Upvote 0
IronBuckI;1217696; said:
I agree with having UK(me) and MSU paired up every year. As for SMU, ECU, and Colorado. If the players are any good, then they will run through their divisions and play a forced human game every year in the conference championship. If they're not any good, then they'll need the break of not playing more than one human player every year.

My input doesn't help you though because it is neither option 1 or 2. If I'm forced to vote between the two choices, then I'd say that we go with option #2
Click to expand...

That was my first thought, that SMU v ECU will probable happen for the conference championship, along with Colorado playing either human in the conference championship game. But didn't want to seem like I was playing favorites since my team is one of them.

But I should have not posted that yet. I am going to PM the teams that are affected the most to see if they don't mind playing more games or not first. Then put it out for a vote. But while I wait for responses to the pm's feel free to put out more ideas.
 
Upvote 0
Welp I sure as hell blew the season opener. Man I wish this was ECU of last year when they had Chris Johnson, he was good, Dominique Lindsay blows balls, I have absolutely no running game. Good shit buchtelgrad, you got me good.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1218050; said:
Michigan feels your pain.



Oh, you meant WVU.
Click to expand...
App%20State%20shush.jpg

th400pyNWMJu-main_Full.jpg

0903_525_asu.jpg

0910_large.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Either Louisville's second string runningback is Superman or I am in for a very long game against Piney and the SMU Mustangs. 3 times I had him stopped in the backfield only to break multiple tackles and run away from my no pursuit angling secondary for long TD runs/catches.

I can't believe that I gave up 42 points to a CPU controlled team. Especially since I've played Louisville about six times since I got the game, and haven't given up more than 38 (in double OT). Even in losses I didn't give up that many points...and that was before I knew what the [censored] the controls were. :(

UK 52 - Louisville 42 W (barely):shake:
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top