Obviously.yt6;2217119; said:If I have to pick one of these three in a huge Bucks game, I am taking Pryor.
Because in the biggest game of Smith's career (2006 BCS championship game), he came up with the worst performance of his career (4 of 14 passing, 5 sacks, interception, fumble, 6 yards of total offense in a 41-14 loss).
And in the biggest game of Pryor's career (2010 Rose Bowl), he had arguably his best game (23 of 37 passing, 2 TDs, INT, 338 yards of total offense in a 26-17 win). Pryor followed that up with another huge game in the 2011 Sugar Bowl (14 of 25 passing, 2 TD, 336 yards of total offense in a 31-26 win).
Miller hasn't played in a big game yet, so he can't really be part of this discussion.
Pryor was clearly more productive than Smith for a longer period. Whether he was "better" than Smith is a matter of opinion. I say "yes", but I can understand the other side of the argument.yt6;2217119; said:I believe that Pryor was a better quarterback and overall more productive than Troy Smith.
Upvote
0