• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Men's Basketball Tidbits 2008-'09 Season

LitlBuck;1300414; said:
That is saying an awful lot. I hope Thad meant one of the best perimeter defenders in OSU history and that still says a great deal.

Well, keep in mind that he was talking about potential. I remember Matta saying the exact same thing about David Lighty when he came in, so it's reasonable to expect that Walter's defense will be comparable to David's. Matta also has used the phrase "lockdown defender" to describe Walter.
 
Upvote 0
I remember the Illinois teams with Turner Gill and Marcus Liberty among others. They had a bunch of 6'4" to 6'6" athletes who could guard anyone on the floor except a big athletic center, and they switched off screens and very seldom found themselves in defensive mismatches. They sure were fun to watch and a bear to play against. I believe they made it to the Final Four and lost to scUM in Fishers interim year (R. Robinson, Glenn Rice and a 6'10" or so center power forward whose name escapes me)

Anyhow, if this Buckeye team embraces defense, specially with Mullens and Lauderdale in the middle to erase some mistakes, they can be a nightmare to play against with Offut, Lighty, Turner, Buford along with Diebs and Simmons who have pretty good size and athleticism and can guard two or three positions. Matta has always seemed to pride himself on defense and he is bringing in plenty of athletic wing type players who can be shutdown defenders, I can't wait to see this years version of the Buckeye Cagers.
 
Upvote 0
dozerbuck;1302655; said:
Kecman and Simmons looked like pretty good shooters :biggrin:

Outside shooting was certainly one of the main motivations behind signing them. The loss of JB was huge in that area (he made over 100 3s last year & next best was Diebler) - OSU was left with no especially reliable outside shooting threats coming into this year if they hadn't added the Juco guys. Crater is not known for his shooting & Offutt is probably going to be like Lighty when he came in (~20% on 3s), hence the need for a shooter like Simmons. Kecman's main asset is his ability to shoot.
 
Upvote 0
DZ83CK;1302675; said:
Outside shooting was certainly one of the main motivations behind signing them. The loss of JB was huge in that area (he made over 100 3s last year & next best was Diebler) - OSU was left with no especially reliable outside shooting threats coming into this year if they hadn't added the Juco guys. Crater is not known for his shooting & Offutt is probably going to be like Lighty when he came in (~20% on 3s), hence the need for a shooter like Simmons. Kecman's main asset is his ability to shoot.

Turner is not a bad shooter from the outside...His finger through his shot off midseason last year...Causing his percentages to go down, and then Buford is a good shooter as well...I also think that the way Lighty has worked on his shot since he got here, that he will shoot a much better percentage this year...

We don't have a real dead eye, and I am not sure outside of Diebler we have a guy that will chuck it up there as many times as Butler, but we should have a solid all around shooting team...
 
Upvote 0
Dispatch

Numbers for dummies

I received in the mail last weekend a complimentary copy of College Basketball Prospectus 2008-2009: The Essential Guide to the Men?s College Basketball Season. It looks at the game like nothing else I?ve come across, getting inside the numbers, though sometimes a little too far
.
The book was authored by Ken Pomeroy and John Gasaway, numbers crunchers whose arithmeticals are legend on the Web. Gasaway through last season wrote the Big Ten Wonk blog that broke down Big Ten teams the way this book breaks down every Division I team.

Here?s a sample of what they have to say about Ohio State last season compared to the magical 2006-07 season:

?What changed? In some surprisingly basic ways -- making shots, preventing the opponent from making shots -- not much (from a percentage standpoint). . . . But there?s more to scoring points than making shots. Most importantly, there?s getting the opportunity to make shots by not turning the ball over. Indeed, turnovers were the largest single difference between an NCAA championship runner-up (who turned the ball over on 17 percent of their trips in conference) and an NIT champ (with a 21 percent turnover rate).?

And what they project for this season:

?For three years in a row and with three vastly different groups of personnel, (coach) Thad Matta?s Buckeyes have played very good defense. The variable has been offense. In (freshmen B.J.) Mullens and (William) Buford, Ohio State has two freshmen used to carrying the offensive load. If they can do so efficiently in the Big Ten (made threes from Buford, Jon Diebler or someone would be a big lift), this team can be better than most people realize. If not, it?ll be another middle-of-the-pack finish.?
Posted by Bob Baptist on October 21, 2008 12:14 PM
 
Upvote 0
Turner wasn't taking or making many 3s even before his injury. We shall see if he has improved his range this year, but even if he has, it is still a reach to expect him to make a lot of 3s this year. He definitely has not been a high volume 3-point shooter to this point and he plays too unselfishly to expect that to change a whole lot. Buford should be able to help some in the area of perimeter shooting, but he will probably have a bit of an adjustment period. Simmons was a high volume 3-point shooter at Mott (made over three 3s per game on average last year on 40% shooting), so he could pick up some of the slack there. If he averages 20+ minutes per game, I expect Simmons to be one of the top 2 on the team in number of 3s made.

Diebler is the guy who could change things considerably. If he improved quite a bit, then OSU will be very dangerous on 3s. A lot of guys shoot poorly on 3s in their freshman year and then are much better the next year.
 
Upvote 0
Coach Matta really lit up when asked on 1460 The Fan Thursday if he could envision a lineup where Turner, Buford and Lighty were on the court at the same time.

Getting very excited for the season and watching the new scoreboard at the Schott.
 
Upvote 0
I watched the team practice today during the Agonis Club tip-off event...

I think Simmons is way better than any of the other PG options when it comes to shooting the 3. No question there. But his leadership isn't where it needs to be. PJ Hill is a much better team leader than any either of the other PG options. Crater showed he was quick & showed his quickness could get him into trouble when he drives too far under the basket. Offutt didn't see any time at the point. I came away with the impression that Simmons would play a lot (~25 minutes on average) and that he was the leader for the PG spot right now but would also see time off the ball.

Lighty was canning the 3s really well. Diebler made like 3-5 (4-6 if you count one slightly after the practice buzzer that banked in) 3s and took Buford off the dribble. Simmons is who I thought he was - a good shooter. I expect Lighty, Diebler & Simmons to be the top 3 on the team in number of 3s made this year.

Dallas looked long and lean sort of like Othello Hunter body-wise only stronger. The word to describe him now is "active." He runs the court well.

Zisis is a guy who Matta said was a lot better than he thought he was. Zisis is a hard worker and is big and strong & can score in the paint. Not a great athlete, but his feet aren't stuck to the floor like KK's seemed to be. He definitely will help out when he becomes eligible next year.

Madsen and Kecman are good at stepping away from the basket and shooting, although Kecman has more range. Kecman's eligibility question was asked & Matta said it wasn't resolved yet, but if he had to sit out any games, it would be 8-16 games.

Offutt missed a couple of 3s and had a couple of TOs and seemed lagging when running up and down the court (his team had to run because his team lost the 5-on-5 game) - he finished behind the bigs like Mullens in the up and down.

BJ can post guys up pretty well, but he needs to do a better job of avoiding charging into defenders and he shouldn't be shooting shots right in front of the old 3-point line because he doesn't quite have that kind of range. At one point he made a nice recovery and blocked what looked like an open shot for Zisis.

Buford missed badly on a couple of shots and hit the deck after he got driven to the basket on a drive by Diebler.

Turner made a couple of nice plays but didn't take many shots.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Here is a nice blog entry from Bob Baptist:

Practice update from Matta (Hoops & Scoops: an OSU basketball blog)

Baptist says Simmons is rumored to have the edge at PG, but quotes Matta as saying Crater has the ability to heat the basketball up defensively & that Simmons needs to do a better job of using his length and playing hard every possession.

The man-to-man defense is what Matta said they've been practicing so far. He said they could go zone, but thinks they need to get down man-to-man principles because the zone uses some of those principles. In the tip-off event he remarked about how the zone held opponents to 38% from the field, which was the lowest opponent FG% in his 8 seasons as a head coach. Baptist hints at the likelihood that they will play zone when Dallas and BJ are in there together.

Interestingly, one of the things in Baptist's blog is the idea that Thad said OSU won't shoot as many 3s this year as prior years. I'm not sure if I buy it, but we'll see. Playing Dallas & BJ together a lot would tend to cause that result, I suppose.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top