I agree on both counts really... I mean yes I'll take the overall numbers any day up in ann whore michigan because this game was away and it was at night. However, Kinlaw/Royster are not in the same league as hart. Michigan has Jake Long also to help pave the way as well. Although I'm confident Gholston kind of makes Long a mute point though. I think we've got to do a better job on run support. For me it becomes the same arguement I've made the past few years. Why are we not brining safties down more frequently?? Just because they are down in the box doesn't mean we can't drop them back when the ball is snapped? Atleast make them think we're going to crowd the box that'll maybe result in a check down or something. I know we fear giving up the big play etc etc, but we have two first round corners (Jenkins a top 10 pick) as well as safties who can drop and do some damage as well. Also I would like to see a little more 4 lineman, 3 backers, 4 DB's as well. I think we are running too much of the 3 lineman, 3 backers, 5 Db's. While this is good for teams who obviously are going to pass the ball I don't think its necessarily a formation we must be in against teams who's QB's are poor or who don't have much of a passing game.
We need more d-line man in the game (4 instead of 3) to keep those big guys off James.. Because as far as run support goes we seem to go as James goes.
Wisconsin- They have no prooven recieving target outside of the tight end. However, with both starting running backs OUT we could get away with not loading the box. Take Beckem away and they have nothing.
illinois- They are the poorest passing team on our schedule. Very run oriented
There is no reason why we can't play a little more base defense, with a little more safty support.