Making the case for the New York Giants to draft Ohio State linebacker James Laurinaitis with the 29th pick
by Mike Garafolo/The Star-Ledger
Wednesday April 22, 2009
Tom Szczerbowski/US Presswire
James Laurinaitis might be limited athletically, but the former Ohio St. linebacker has been lauded for his instincts and work ethic.
Tuesday, I did a mock draft for NFL.com (I don't think it's been posted yet) in which there was a run on wide receivers right before I picked. Hakeem Nicks, Darrius Heyward-Bey and Brian Robiskie all came off the board right before I, playing the role of Jerry Reese, stepped up to the podium.
In the true spirit of a mock draft, I slipped into character and imagined myself as Reese. And because I had to make the pick without the option of trading up or down, I imagined the Browns simply wanted too much for Braylon Edwards and that my attempts to trade up had been thwarted. So with the 29th pick in one of thousands of fake drafts, the New York Giants (read: MG) selected Ohio State linebacker James Laurinaitis.
And here I thought that was going to be a popular pick.
First of all, I know a lot of you folks have been rabid in your assessment of Antonio Pierce's play last season. You think he was less than stellar for much of the year and, at times, he was horrible. You also blame him for being part of the distraction that was Plaxico Burress' situation. (Never mind for now what I think about these points. I'll get there in a second.)
And I figured you would be happy with a guy who has been tremendously productive and consistent at a premier position for a top college program.
Instead, in talking and e-mailing with a few people, I got a lot of shoulder shrugs, one "Meh" and a few "bad pick" responses. And honestly, I don't get it. How is that a bad pick? I hear the criticisms about his speed (4.70 40-yard dash appears to have been his best number), even some questions about his strength and the concerns about how Ohio State LBs drafted in the first round recently haven't exactly been fitted for their Hall of Fame blazers yet.
But Laurinaitis seems to be a consistent player, an excellent tackler who doesn't shy away from contact, a "student of the game" (sorry for the cliche) and a guy who simply loves to play football. If that's not a description of exactly what you want from a middle linebacker, I don't know what is. And if that's not the description of a Tom Coughlin player, again, somebody needs to point me in another direction.
I also heard Michigan State QB Brian Hoyer on Sirius/XM NFL Radio yesterday saying Laurinaitis is as good as anyone at reading and diagnosing the play, knowing what's coming and putting himself and his teammates in the right spot to make a play. Sound like anybody you know? Anybody that currently wears No. 58 for the Giants?
Look, I don't think Pierce's 2008 season was nearly as bad as many believe. He was highlighted and seemingly exploited by Brian Westbrook on a few plays, but I've spoken at length about those plays being total team breakdowns, not individual mistakes by Pierce. And I also think he did a good job keeping a banged-up defense together. The big problem with the '08 Giants down the stretch was not the defense. No way.
Having said that, why wouldn't the Giants want to have a solid backup for Pierce and perhaps a potential replacement? And wouldn't Laurinaitis, who's already a smart player, benefit from learning from one of the smartest, most instinctive linebackers in the NFL? Sure he would.
In short, I guess what I'm saying is I wouldn't have a problem with the Giants' sitting at No. 29 (if they can't trade up) and grabbing Laurinaitis and then using any of their next four picks to grab a couple of receivers.