If there is one think that's for sure, you kill someone with a samuri sword, you mean business.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
That is pure poetry...BuckeyeNation27 said:im asking you why you think hockey highlights clutter up espn. you say cuz they suck. i ask why you think they suck. you say cuz they clutter up espn. stop being such a fuck stick.
Yes keep burning bridges over that damn toaster...your judgment day is creeping closer.akakbuck said:Toast...fuck cereal
BuckeyeNation27 said:tirade? hardly.
heres the problem i have with you. you make dumbass posts, and then when people try to answer them you come back with "please explain." then when you say something and i ask you to explain....youre too much of a dumb **** to explain.
im asking you why you think hockey highlights clutter up espn. you say cuz they suck. i ask why you think they suck. you say cuz they clutter up espn. stop being such a **** stick.
and no, just because im swearing doesnt mean im going on a tirade. im as laid back as you can get. why are you incapable of answering questions with straight answers...........oh wait, maybe we already know the answer to that
i never knew you were such a dumbass............no wait, i did.djtidebuck said:Bucknat, I never knew you were son sensitive.
This is your best attempt at adding something to the conversation? Why don't you provide me a link to all of your informative posts (if you can find any)?scUM Buster said:Donny,
This is long overdue, but earned nonetheless. Feel free to use as your avatar.
Bucknat starts spewing expletives and that gives him an edge in a "battle of wits?"Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:I'll put v500 on 27 winning any battle of wits with Donald.
What the hell is an "explicative" you moron? There could be no attempt by you to enter a battle of wits, because you have to have wit to enter. Idiot.djtidebuck said:Bucknat starts spewing explicatives and that gives him an edge in a "battle of wits?"
There was no attempt by me to enter into a "battle of wits" with Bucknat. He tries to hassle me on many of my posts and when I call him on it, well, you see how he acts.
Read this entire thread. I did not call anyone "out" about their post. He attacked my post and I merely responded. You enter the discussion by calling someone an idiot? I will refrain from "name-calling."FKAGobucks877 said:What the hell is an "explicative" you moron? There could be no attempt by you to enter a battle of wits, because you have to have wit to enter. Idiot.
And the last thing you need to be doing is calling someone else out about their informative posts. You have yet to ever, in the entire history of the internet, make an informative post.
Buckeyebitemybuttocks, :tongue2: Apparently you gave enough to wager vcash.Buckeyeskickbuttocks said:Sorry, Don, you've mistaken me for someone who gives a ****.