amybuckeye
amybuckeye
Gatorubet;1886008; said:Tell you what - if Amy agrees to donate to the 2011 spring drive, I'll quit posting for the night. :p ???? Taker Amykins???
I will donate gladly if you agree to join Amway.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Gatorubet;1886008; said:Tell you what - if Amy agrees to donate to the 2011 spring drive, I'll quit posting for the night. :p ???? Taker Amykins???
MililaniBuckeye;1886015; said:The e-mails do make it look pretty bad. Now, we all can be selfish and think, "Well, he should reported this internally", but I think he initially weighed the options and felt that any potential leak of information regarding players possibly being involved could jeopardize their safety. In hind sight, nearly all of us would say he should've brought this to the attention of someone within the athletic and/or compliance functions, but I think he was at the time making the decision he felt was in protection of his players, and by protection I mean from criminals and not the NCAA (although you could argue they're one and the same).
One needs to look at intent here. Did he find out about players violating NCAA rules? Yep. Were the violations "stand-alone" violations, i.e., were they simply violations that had no other potential consequences? Nope. He wasn't refraining from reporting the violations because players could get suspended but rather because players could be in serious peopardy through retatiation by the criminal element. Tressel's 15 years in Youngstown taught him that there are folks you simply don't risk [censored]ing with.
It's not like he found out that Pryor and Herron were selling personal stuff to some old folks home--where there is no potential danger--for big profits and then went out of his way to cover it up.
LordJeffBuck;1886019; said:On the field, I've almost always been "all in" because the guy can flat out coach.
Off the field, I've always been a bit skeptical - yes he's good with discipline when it's Marcel Frost or Erik Haw or James Scott or some other non-contributor ... but he has allowed far too many star players to tarnish his reputation, going all the way back to Ray Isaacs at YSU, and of course MoC, Troy, and now Pryor here at tOSU. I do believe that JT is a high character guy in most respects, but it does appear that he has occasional bouts of wilfull ignorance, especially when an irreplaceable player is concerned.
LordJeffBuck;1886019; said:On the field, I've almost always been "all in" because the guy can flat out coach.
Off the field, I've always been a bit skeptical - yes he's good with discipline when it's Marcel Frost or Erik Haw or James Scott or some other non-contributor ... but he has allowed far too many star players to tarnish his reputation, going all the way back to Ray Isaacs at YSU, and of course MoC, Troy, and now Pryor here at tOSU. I do believe that JT is a high character guy in most respects, but it does appear that he has occasional bouts of wilfull ignorance, especially when an irreplaceable player is concerned.
amybuckeye;1885968; said:Gator I really don't have a problem with you posting on this topic. In fact I gave you a greenie to show support. However, I'm starting to notice that you have probably posted the most out of everybody in the Tressel/NCAA violations related threads. Considering the fact that you are not an OSU fan, your frequency of posts on this topic is starting to morph into troll-like behavior. Let me paint a clearer picture. If BuckeyePlanet were a room full of people discussing OSU football and the recent NCAA violations, you'd be yapping away while the rest of us are gasping for air and reaching for oxygen masks. Think about taking a breather. Just saying....
MililaniBuckeye;1886015; said:The e-mails do make it look pretty bad. Now, we all can be selfish and think, "Well, he should reported this internally", but I think he initially weighed the options and felt that any potential leak of information regarding players possibly being involved could jeopardize their safety. In hind sight, nearly all of us would say he should've brought this to the attention of someone within the athletic and/or compliance functions, but I think he was at the time making the decision he felt was in protection of his players, and by protection I mean from criminals and not the NCAA (although you could argue they're one and the same).
starBUCKS;1886040; said:The whole "any names from our last discussion?? I would like to hold some collateral if you know what I mean ... jt" is the one thing that makes me feel a little icky about this thing. He seemingly goes from wanting to help, to wanting something to hold over the suspected players. Now, we all know that words can sometimes come across differently than the writer meant. But, collateral for what? The e-mails end there... so, we don't really know, and he could be implying that he would approach those players with the truth card in his back pocket and question them... or use it later on at his discretion. Maybe the use of "collateral" was a poor word to use.
buckeyefan_1;1886046; said:Star...about the "holding some collateral" sentence...i thought he was implying that they were to recieve the newest championship rings and that he was going to hold them(as in refrain from giving them) to the players who had sold said rings in the past. i only read the email once so i may be way off here but thats the way i took it. im going to go read it again. :)
While I carry zero weight more than any Buckeye fan here, I do support the Buckeyes after my years being allowed to hang here, and the friends on line and in real life I have had the privilege to meet and have a beer with.Magua;1886043; said:Gator carries more weight around here than most buckeye fans do...
I also tend to believe Gator has become an OSU fan since his time here and would rank us 2nd behind his Gators :)