powerlifter
▪█───────█
I always hear people bitch about conference this and conference that. There is no way anyone knows exactly how good a conference is. The only possible way to judge is non conference games and thats a bullshit way of telling. If West Virginia played USC and pulled one out of their ass does that mean the big east is better then the pac? You can say it would never happen but we all just act like the Stanford game didnt happen I don't. You can't judge non conference games just as well as you can't judge conferences.
There is no doubt the big east is down in the dumps. I, in no way, can defend that. If pitt was undefeated and the rest of the conference was horrible,noone would be complaining. If you can sit there and honestly tell me how good each conference is compared to another,you are a better man then I.
Teams play within the conference.Therefore, you can only tell how good a team is in that specific conference. It's impossible to determine who would win the big ten if a few more teams joined it as well as other conferences.
Everyone complains about the BCS, which I do as well. Then that should be a dead giveaway that just because the BCS says this is the top ten teams,doesnt mean that's the top ten teams.
There is no doubt the big east is down in the dumps. I, in no way, can defend that. If pitt was undefeated and the rest of the conference was horrible,noone would be complaining. If you can sit there and honestly tell me how good each conference is compared to another,you are a better man then I.
Teams play within the conference.Therefore, you can only tell how good a team is in that specific conference. It's impossible to determine who would win the big ten if a few more teams joined it as well as other conferences.
Everyone complains about the BCS, which I do as well. Then that should be a dead giveaway that just because the BCS says this is the top ten teams,doesnt mean that's the top ten teams.
Upvote
0