Hoke-y characters

[BUCKYLE]

might want to revisit the bar fight case. He was found not guilty of that and won a counter suit for defamation of character.

I thought we established that as long as we were saying "seems to me", that facts were irrelevant. So fuck yourself you jerkoff TSUN asshole.

 

[Fungo Squiggly]

I thought we established that as long as we were saying "seems to me", that facts were irrelevant. So fuck yourself you jerkoff TSUN asshole.

Seems to me that this deserves a GPA!

 

[WolverineMike]

YouTube - Demar Dorsey O LET DO IT.wmv

Thought you were talking about somebody else.

 

[Buckeye86]

Thought you were talking about somebody else.

I wasn't talking about anyone, I was just expressing my desire to revisit whatever you were talking about. Let's do it! (And that, of course, is the joke, I don't really care about whatever you were talking about.)

 

[buckiprof]

@ buckiprof

so you're of the mindset of "if everyone else's players are getting arrested, it's alright that we have some getting arrested too." Got it.

Wow simply wow.

Your ability to think critically, as well as read and truly comprehend, is well below that of my 8th grade son.

With that comment, you have demonstrated a complete lack of the basics of the English language as well as the basics of critical thinking.

Sorry you do not understand the most basic component of what constitutes research to support one of your typical "pull it out of my ass" type quips.

Sorry that you do not understand that when you state something along the lines of "seems to be a high number of incidents" that looking at other programs in one's research would be required due to a possible "bias" of where one lives as well as other influencing factors (one possible one is the age component that you even referenced).

But what I am truly sorry for is that I have wasted some time in trying to prompt you to do some basic research to support your typical "pull one out of your ass type quips", like the post that I quoted here.

 

[NFBuck]

wrong about there being more than coop?

Your entire point is wrong. Early on, JT had some issues with players. Since then (2003/04), there have been a below normal (against other top D1 programs) number. Like Prof said, do the research before throwing generic jabs out on a rival's board.

 

[jwinslow]

@ buckiprof

so you're of the mindset of "if everyone else's players are getting arrested, it's alright that we have some getting arrested too." Got it.

No, he's of the 'accusations should be based on substance not feelings' mindset.

 

[jwinslow]

Since Mike doesn't seem interested in doing his own research, I'll turn to one of his colleagues:

2001 - 2
2002 - 8
2003 - 5
2004 - 8
2005 - 3
2006 - 1
2007 - 1
2008 - 2

2009 -
Adams & Shugarts were pulled over with drug paraphernalia. Charges were later dropped.

 

[WolverineMike]

Wow simply wow.

Your ability to think critically, as well as read and truly comprehend, is well below that of my 8th grade son.

With that comment, you have demonstrated a complete lack of the basics of the English language as well as the basics of critical thinking.

Sorry you do not understand the most basic component of what constitutes research to support one of your typical "pull it out of my ass" type quips.

Sorry that you do not understand that when you state something along the lines of "seems to be a high number of incidents" that looking at other programs in one's research would be required due to a possible "bias" of where one lives as well as other influencing factors (one possible one is the age component that you even referenced).

But what I am truly sorry for is that I have wasted some time in trying to prompt you to do some basic research to support your typical "pull one out of your ass type quips", like the post that I quoted here.

I accept all your apologies.

 

[buckiprof]

Since Mike doesn't seem interested in doing his own research, I'll turn to one of his colleagues:

2009 -
Adams & Shugarts were pulled over with drug paraphernalia. Charges were later dropped.

Mike should thank you for the preliminary research Josh.

BTW Mike, this also points out another example of how nice some are to you here. Why, I do not know. You have numerous posts void of any real substance, but because you are a skunkbear fan who doesn't appear to be the typical arrogant Walmart wolverine, maybe that gives you a "pass" of some sort, hence the niceness.

Personally, if we have to have skunkbear fans here, I'll take the ones like zwem. Good football knowledge, good skunkbear knowledge, most posts are of substance, and adds to the overall richness of the board.

 

[buckiprof]

I accept all your apologies.

I guess I was wrong. In addition to being a typical arrogant Walmart wolverine, you are idiotic as well.

Now make another one of your typical void of anything of substance type posts in reply to this. It would be in line with your other 1888 posts here.

 

[OSU_Buckguy]

all-time fulmer cup points

m*ch*gan: 18 points

ohio state: 8 points


congrats, scummers. you finally beat us at something.

 

[NFBuck]

all-time fulmer cup points

m*ch*gan: 18 points

ohio state: 8 points


congrats, scummers. you finally beat us at something.

*Snap*

 

[WolverineMike]

Mike should thank you for the preliminary research Josh.

BTW Mike, this also points out another example of how nice some are to you here. Why, I do not know. You have numerous posts void of any real substance, but because you are a skunkbear fan who doesn't appear to be the typical arrogant Walmart wolverine, maybe that gives you a "pass" of some sort, hence the niceness.

Personally, if we have to have skunkbear fans here, I'll take the ones like zwem. Good football knowledge, good skunkbear knowledge, most posts are of substance, and adds to the overall richness of the board.

I already knew of Tress' "dirty 30." That's why my initial question was how that compared to Cooper's tenure. As a knowledgeable group of fans, I thought it might be something that had been discussed in the past and might have been an easy answer for a buckeye fan. Since it seems to be a question nobody has visited, I will begin my own research on it.

Unfortunately, I do not have the time to research all 100+ Universities in the nation, as you seem to think that has some bearing on my initial question. I feel it does not so I won't bother with that.

as to the rest of your insight, like most message boards out there, this one comes complete with an "ignore" feature. If i'm making your life so miserable with what you consider less substance, feel free to put me on your ignore list. You won't hurt my feelings.

 

[jwinslow]

I already knew of Tress' "dirty 30." That's why my initial question was how that compared to Cooper's tenure.

No, your initial question was nothing like that. You mocked the notion of Tressel pursuing character guys because he has brought in so many troublemakers, and you based that around a laughably vague set of memories and feelings. Even your Cooper comparison was vague. Even better, you snuck in a not so subtle 'well he wins, but with troublemakers' line.

After being called on that weak sauce and told to back it up with something useful, you tried to trivialize his response as enabling troublemakers because others do it too.

Both of those posts were remarkably baseless and antagonistic. If you knew about a total, then why didn't you bring that up? Because you were only sort of trying to bring up a pissing match, but not completely?


Prof doesn't have to like you. I've enjoyed having you on the board in many other threads. That doesn't change this ridiculous string of baiting, insults and mocking viewpoints without providing any actual substance until called on it about six different times (before which snide, sarcastic, evasive responses were given).