• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Gym Pet Peeves

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
How's the weather up there, Jeff? And can you see where you're going?

a_geek_on_a_high_horse.gif
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;849613; said:
As the last several pages attest, the only reasomable and logical conclusion is that Jeff is in the majority.

This should be obvious because he is the only one advancing his particular position.
Click to expand...

well that and because this thread is now 23 pages
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;849577; said:
:huh:The A&F is beyond ironic, b/c many here find paying $23 for underwear as absurd as you find wearing that brand name to the gym.I don't see pads on those in the gym. I see zero excuse for form-fitting underarmour, when you combine the discomfort for others. If we're talking about looser fitting underarmour, some is worse than others.
Which thread would you like? The one where you assume all drinkers are too big of a liability to be near children, yet somehow you can excuse your strange thoughts about murder & background with antifreeze? If the pirate is unfit for many lines of employment simply b/c she could be hung over, should there not be a larger fallout from your confessions?

Or where you deduce someone's sexual preference from quick glances in the mirror?

Or where you determine their devotion and worthiness to be at the gym by casual observation?
Click to expand...

who cares how much i pay? it is a matter of preference. if somebody buys a hona instead of a ferrari are you calling them absurd?.......they want a ferrari. that is their preference. there is no function reasoning of wearing designer clothing in a gym. if somebody wears a tux to a gym should be just look away and say "hey thats his preference"......no because it is obviously incorrect.

you stipulate underarmor/dri-fit material as a negative thing. care to explain why? is it not fuctional? is it not worn by athletes or by others working out?

"i want to kill the president in x and x manner" <---does that imply i am going to kill the president?.....no. does it seem like logical proposition or possibility that i will carry that act out?......no. i eliminated a stray cat by killing it with anti-freeze....your point? thump drowned a groundhog, various others shot pests, so what makes me "special".
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Jeffcat;849615; said:
who cares how much i pay? it is a matter of preference. if somebody buys a ferrari instead of a ferrari are you calling them absurd?.......
Click to expand...

As a matter of fact, logically, reasonably ... I think I would. I mean what's the point in buying a ferrari if you are trying to avoid buying a ferrari?

if somebody wears a tux to a gym should be just look away and say "hey thats his preference"......no because it is obviously incorrect.
Click to expand...
Please provide support for this admittedly logical, reasonable and morally correct position.

What evidence do you have that it is "obviously incorrect."
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top