Jeffcat;849560; said:i don't really see player on football fields wearing polos under their uniforms.
.
Why are you looking under other mens uniforms?
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Jeffcat;849560; said:i don't really see player on football fields wearing polos under their uniforms.
.
Don't forget arrogant... you forgot arrogant.Jeffcat;849564; said:well i am very sorry for obeying the ideals of being logical, reasonable, and morally correct. my bad
Jeffcat;849560; said:in a hypothetical situation if i see bob barely able to walk drunk and he drives home and crashes on the way, then i am idiotic for coming to the assumption that it was probably because he was drunk. can i prove my assumption correct at that point and time?.......no but that doesn't mean from the basis of logic and reasoning that i can not form the most probable conclusion that he crashed because he was drunk. to adamantly go against that claim is insulting logic and reasoning in itself which is a moot point to say the least.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;849571; said:Don't forget arrogant... you forgot arrogant.
Logical - If all Ps are Q and some Qs are Z, how many Ps are Z?
Reasonable - What's your position on drinking on your own time and being a teacher?
Morally correct - Subjective. Demonstrate otherwise.
Jeffcat;849569; said:why are you doing the same thing you always do by changing a topic after your posts get shot down?
pirate thread.
The A&F is beyond ironic, b/c many here find paying $23 for underwear as absurd as you find wearing that brand name to the gym.mocking people for overdressing in A&F?.......i wear A&F but casual designer clothing doesn't belong where athletic apparel is worn.
I don't see pads on those in the gym. I see zero excuse for form-fitting underarmour, when you combine the discomfort for others. If we're talking about looser fitting underarmour, some is worse than others.i don't really see player on football fields wearing polos under their uniforms.
Which thread would you like? The one where you assume all drinkers are too big of a liability to be near children, yet somehow you can excuse your strange thoughts about murder & background with antifreeze? If the pirate is unfit for many lines of employment simply b/c she could be hung over, should there not be a larger fallout from your confessions?in a hypothetical situation if i see bob barely able to walk drunk and he drives home and crashes on the way, then i am idiotic for coming to the assumption that it was probably because he was drunk. can i prove my assumption correct at that point and time?.......no but that doesn't mean from the basis of logic and reasoning that i can not form the most probable conclusion that he crashed because he was drunk. to adamantly go against that claim is insulting logic and reasoning in itself which is a moot point to say the least.
Jeffcat;849566; said:nope just language
As someone who can read the rationale given to Jeff when he was issued a warning for the offending post, I can assure you it wasn't "just the language"buckeyefool;849568; said:rrrriiiggghhhtttt
Jeffcat;849573; said:
Jwin.. didnt you read? He's logical, rational and morally correct.jwinslow;849577; said:The one where you assume all drunks are too big of a liability to be near children, yet somehow you can excuse your strange thoughts about murder & background with antifreeze?
Or where you deduce someone's sexual preference from quick glances in the mirror?
Or where you determine their devotion and worthiness to be at the gym by casual observation?
OCBucksFan;849574; said:
We've gone over the drinking topic, you fail to understand that some people can drink and have a good time and still be responsible. That's a YOU ISSUE, not an everyone issue, whether you want to stand on your high horse and say you're right is up to you, but there's millions of people who will disagree with you.
And people don't come after you, there's plenty of threads you post to where there's comments and jokes that have nothing to do with you, it's when ever anyone attempts to debate with you. Suddenly you act like your word is the word of GOD and no one else's opinion has any weight.
isn't hate speech really just a poor choice of words?Buckeyeskickbuttocks;849579; said:As someone who can read the rationale given to Jeff when he was issued a warning for the offending post, I can assure you it wasn't "just the language"
Clearly. Why don't you try making better arguments, Mr. Rational-Morally Correct-Logician.Jeffcat;849575; said:you clearly are unable to even understand some of the arguments i even made.