• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
Jeffcat;849564; said:
well i am very sorry for obeying the ideals of being logical, reasonable, and morally correct. my bad
Don't forget arrogant... you forgot arrogant.

Logical - If all Ps are Q and some Qs are Z, how many Ps are Z?
Reasonable - What's your position on drinking on your own time and being a teacher?
Morally correct - Subjective. Demonstrate otherwise.
 
Upvote 0
Jeffcat;849560; said:
in a hypothetical situation if i see bob barely able to walk drunk and he drives home and crashes on the way, then i am idiotic for coming to the assumption that it was probably because he was drunk. can i prove my assumption correct at that point and time?.......no but that doesn't mean from the basis of logic and reasoning that i can not form the most probable conclusion that he crashed because he was drunk. to adamantly go against that claim is insulting logic and reasoning in itself which is a moot point to say the least.


awjeeztj9.jpg


We've gone over the drinking topic, you fail to understand that some people can drink and have a good time and still be responsible. That's a YOU ISSUE, not an everyone issue, whether you want to stand on your high horse and say you're right is up to you, but there's millions of people who will disagree with you.

And people don't come after you, there's plenty of threads you post to where there's comments and jokes that have nothing to do with you, it's when ever anyone attempts to debate with you. Suddenly you act like your word is the word of GOD and no one else's opinion has any weight.
 
Upvote 0
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;849571; said:
Don't forget arrogant... you forgot arrogant.

Logical - If all Ps are Q and some Qs are Z, how many Ps are Z?
Reasonable - What's your position on drinking on your own time and being a teacher?
Morally correct - Subjective. Demonstrate otherwise.

you clearly are unable to even understand some of the arguments i even made.
 
Upvote 0
pirate thread.
:huh:
mocking people for overdressing in A&F?.......i wear A&F but casual designer clothing doesn't belong where athletic apparel is worn.
The A&F is beyond ironic, b/c many here find paying $23 for underwear as absurd as you find wearing that brand name to the gym.
i don't really see player on football fields wearing polos under their uniforms.
I don't see pads on those in the gym. I see zero excuse for form-fitting underarmour, when you combine the discomfort for others. If we're talking about looser fitting underarmour, some is worse than others.
in a hypothetical situation if i see bob barely able to walk drunk and he drives home and crashes on the way, then i am idiotic for coming to the assumption that it was probably because he was drunk. can i prove my assumption correct at that point and time?.......no but that doesn't mean from the basis of logic and reasoning that i can not form the most probable conclusion that he crashed because he was drunk. to adamantly go against that claim is insulting logic and reasoning in itself which is a moot point to say the least.
Which thread would you like? The one where you assume all drinkers are too big of a liability to be near children, yet somehow you can excuse your strange thoughts about murder & background with antifreeze? If the pirate is unfit for many lines of employment simply b/c she could be hung over, should there not be a larger fallout from your confessions?

Or where you deduce someone's sexual preference from quick glances in the mirror?

Or where you determine their devotion and worthiness to be at the gym by casual observation?
 
Upvote 0
jwinslow;849577; said:
The one where you assume all drunks are too big of a liability to be near children, yet somehow you can excuse your strange thoughts about murder & background with antifreeze?

Or where you deduce someone's sexual preference from quick glances in the mirror?

Or where you determine their devotion and worthiness to be at the gym by casual observation?
Jwin.. didnt you read? He's logical, rational and morally correct.

:shake:
 
Upvote 0
OCBucksFan;849574; said:
awjeeztj9.jpg


We've gone over the drinking topic, you fail to understand that some people can drink and have a good time and still be responsible. That's a YOU ISSUE, not an everyone issue, whether you want to stand on your high horse and say you're right is up to you, but there's millions of people who will disagree with you.

And people don't come after you, there's plenty of threads you post to where there's comments and jokes that have nothing to do with you, it's when ever anyone attempts to debate with you. Suddenly you act like your word is the word of GOD and no one else's opinion has any weight.

tell me how I created a debate in a thread over pet peeves in a gym?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top