I really don't know where you're getting this from... when has OSU stacked the box with 8 guys, let alone 9?Thats why you will almost certainly see 9 men in the box.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I really don't know where you're getting this from... when has OSU stacked the box with 8 guys, let alone 9?Thats why you will almost certainly see 9 men in the box.
I totally disagree that its not an OC issue. Some plays work against constant pressure, plays that take to long to develop don't. If Texas gets constantly stuffed and sacked, do you not think that Greg Davis will get some of the blame?No doubt and its not an issue of the OC making an adjustment. Its entirely a matter on if the rookie quarterback can execute consistently enough, make the right reads and get the ball on time/on target in the face of what will be a very intense pass rush all night long.
Is it your viewpoint that your secondary can match up with our receivers man on man? If you are putting nine in the box, your safeties will not be covering our receivers. Putting nine in the box, and leaving one on one coverage of Limas Sweed, Billy Pittman, Quan Cosby, and/or JFinley? It doesn't take long to through a quick slant, or just throw it up to Sweed who is 6'5". People have come down hard on Greg Davis in the past, but I stil think he will be able to handle it.As I said earlier, when you go into an aggressive blitz mode you WILL give up a few plays but you will also make a lot of big plays. Thats why you usually see a steady diet of blitz's in two cases.... where you are playing a team that you believe your corners and safties can match up man on man without too much difficulty and ESPECIALLY when you have a ROOKIE Quarterback. Rookies are prone to make mistakes, miss reads and not play well in the face if big pressure.
Thats why you will almost certainly see 9 men in the box. Negate Charles ability to control the game. Force the rookie quarterback to consistently make plays.
Buckeyes win 55-14. GO BUCKS! DESTROY TEXAS!
or just throw it up to Sweed who is 6'5".
I can't wait until this game finally gets here and gets over with. I think there will be some sort of meltdown on the boards, though, when the game is finally over. I mean we are 5 months away from the game and this thread is already 50+ pages. What will everybody do? There won't be anything left to debate or discuss... LOL!! Just kidding- of course the final score and the role the officials had and if they made bad calls will be talked about in this thread until next season.
But seriously- Is there anything left to be said, disected, and then taken wrong or out of context regarding this game? I mean, 50+ pages is a lot of space to say nothing new.
Maybe the Fiesta Bowl is still fresh in my remembery, but this statement reminds me of Notre Dame fans.
I'm not saying that having a 6" height advantage over the defender is meaningless. It's actually a very nice advantage. But we all saw how it helped Notre Dame in the Fiesta Bowl.
If you're going to make outrageous claims like this, you're going to have to come up with some statistics skewed completely to your side and then ignore any posts that rebuff said statistics or come up with more to continue to draw folks into your web of circular logic. If you don't know what I'm talking about, read back a few pages, you will.I may be completely wrong, but goddammit I'm sick of thinking rationally. Buckeyes win 55-14. GO BUCKS! DESTROY TEXAS!
Well my dear Waston, by looking at his post count and reading his latest response I can deduce, and feel 100% accurate I might add, that our young alum01 was clearly not on this board durring the build up to last years game
I mean we are 5 months away from the game and this thread is already 50+ pages. What will everybody do? There won't be anything left to debate or discuss
If you're going to make outrageous claims like this, you're going to have to come up with some statistics skewed completely to your side and then ignore any posts that rebuff said statistics or come up with more to continue to draw folks into your web of circular logic. If you don't know what I'm talking about, read back a few pages, you will.
I have been a member here for the duration,
Not quite. This site has existed since May 2003...you joined Jul 2004, behind 761 other members. Now, in your defense, you definitely were around for last year's Texas game thread...however, you're not a charter member as you imply.