This site is supported by the advertisements on it, please disable your AdBlocker so we can continue to provide you with the quality content you expect.
  1. Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!
    Dismiss Notice

Four Questions Facing the Buckeyes - SI.com

Discussion in 'Buckeye Football' started by BuckeyeNation27, Apr 1, 2005.

  1. BuckeyeNation27

    BuckeyeNation27 Goal Goal USA! Staff Member

    http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2005/football/ncaa/03/31/bc.fbc.buckeyesstart.ap/index.html
    Four questions facing the Buckeyes
    Posted: Thursday March 31, 2005 4:46PM; Updated: Thursday March 31, 2005 5:23PM

    COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- A team with 18 of its 22 starting position players back doesn't figure to have a whole lot of mysteries. Yet Ohio State still has to sort through and answer several questions during its month of spring practices, which got under way on Thursday.

    Here's a who's who on the Buckeyes focal points leading up to and long after the annual spring game on April 23:

    Who's the quarterback?

    With Troy Smith ruled out of the season-opener on Sept. 3 against Miami (Ohio) for taking money from a booster, Justin Zwick reclaims the starting job with Todd Boeckman the backup.

    "Those will be the guys who we'll prepare -- being the people you're going to count on in game one," coach Jim Tressel said.

    Smith, however, is working out with the team and will be doing everything the other quarterbacks are doing up to the Miami game. After that, the Buckeyes have the luxury of having two experienced juniors at the position, with Boeckman still an unknown quantity after spending the last two years around the program but never seeing game action.

    For now, Smith is in the background although no one believes that he will be once the season gets going in earnest.

    "You have to have a beginning point," Tressel said. After that, he called the race for the job, "an open competition between people with more experience."

    Who replaces Mike Nugent?

    Josh Huston, who had the placekicking job briefly three years ago before Nugent claimed it for good, has graduated and will be enrolled in graduate school this fall. He has appealed to the NCAA for another year of eligibility and expects to hear back within a short time.

    "We're optimistic based on precedents," Tressel said of Huston's chances for another year.

    Regardless of who does the placements, it'll be extremely difficult to replace the ultra-dependable Nugent, who was the nation's best kicker for the past three years.

    What is Ted Ginn Jr.'s role?

    Ohio State sent its offensive coaches to LSU, Oklahoma and Arkansas to tap those staffs for ideas. One of those ideas, naturally, would be how to get the ball into the mercurial Ginn's hands more often. The Buckeyes took off last year at precisely the same time that Ginn began a remarkable freshman campaign by leading the nation with four punt returns for touchdowns.

    Ginn ran the ball just 13 times (for 113 yards and two touchdowns), had 25 catches (for 359 yards and two scores), 15 punt returns (for 384 yards) and two kickoff returns (40 more yards). In other words, he got the ball only 55 times last season and still scored eight times.

    Ohio State will find a way to get him the ball more -- putting him in the slot or in the backfield, and also returning kickoffs -- in addition to his usual load of receptions and punt returns. Tressel said he's open-minded about opening things up.

    "We'd like to be very explosive," he said. "The more problems you can give defenses ... you know, I'd prefer to have every scheme that there is, to be able to attack a defense in so many different ways."

    Who's at tailback?

    For a team with so much talent and depth, it has to be troubling that the Buckeyes are so thin and so unproven at such an important spot.

    Sophomore Antonio Pittman, who ran for 381 yards and a touchdown a year ago, has the edge this spring. He's battling Erik Haw, who was an acclaimed recruit a year ago before being redshirted. Only one recruit (Freddie Lenix) has a tailback pedigree, and is unlikely to step in as the controversial Maurice Clarett did three years ago as a freshman.

    Not only do the Buckeyes have few players at the position, but none of the candidates have shown they can withstand a season taking the bumps and grinds that come with being an every-Saturday back in the Big Ten.

    "They're going to have to be warriors back there," Tressel said.

    Copyright 2004 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.





    nice, but somebody might want to introduce this guy to Maurice Wells.
     
  2. bucknut11

    bucknut11 Defense still wins Championships

    Perhaps he considers Mo Wells to be a scat-back instead of a tailback? At any rate, yes, he'll definitely be in the mix and I think he has some "pedigree."
     
  3. jwinslow

    jwinslow A MAN OF BETRAYED JUSTICE Staff Member Tourney Pick'em Champ

  4. strohs

    strohs Go Bucks!

    I would replace the what is TGII's role with the cornerback question.
    And how the heck do you forget about Mo Wells??
     
  5. LloydSev

    LloydSev DreamWeaver

    [​IMG] or.. [​IMG]


    Maurice .................................................... Freddie

    How do you mix these guys up?
     
  6. bukIpower

    bukIpower Senior

    yeah really? needs to do alittle more work on the recruits coming in but over all a good write up. I like tressels comments about him wanting to be more explosive because it creates many ways we can attack. It seems tressel is starting to be alittle more open with his offense and his goals for our teams.
     
  7. Folanator

    Folanator Brawndo's got electrolytes...

    I am just thankful that one of the challenges isn't the impending NCAA sanctions. :shake:


    Good write up and except for the Mo Wells thing, not too far off.
     
  8. daddyphatsacs

    daddyphatsacs Let the cards fall...

    It's refreshing to read an article that doesn't mention any NCAA sanctions. As for RB, we'll see. I anticipate an explosive passing attack early on next season until the running game develops.
     
  9. IrontonBuck

    IrontonBuck Walk On

    Either that, or he is in the fifth year of implementing his program, and now it's starting to flower.

    He either stumbled into this 2005 team or he planned it from the beginning. which do you think it is? Luck, or skill? I'll take skill.
     
  10. jwinslow

    jwinslow A MAN OF BETRAYED JUSTICE Staff Member Tourney Pick'em Champ

    Keep in mind how effective tressel ball would have been in 03 (and probably 04) had mr clarett repented of his crimes.
     
  11. Dryden

    Dryden Sober as Sarkisian Staff Member Tech Admin

    Exactly. The loss of Clarett really hurt. Once Clarett showed up, JaJa Riley and Sammy Maldanado bailed, and we stopped pursuing elite RBs for two full recruiting seasons. It was a domino effect that hurt the team at RB for two full seasons, possibly even three. After Iowa's season last year, I'm a pessimist about going into a 2005 NC-campaign with only Pittman, Wells, and Haw.
     
  12. zincfinger

    zincfinger Gert Frobe-approved

    I try not to - opportunities wasted... The guy was a dominator and those teams would've been monsters - odds on favorites for conference titles both years (certainly '03) and possibly at least one additional undefeated season. Good lord, with the clock-chewing, field-chewing running attack we would've had?

    What happened to Iowa last year was freakish, and very low probability to happen to us, or anyone else (they lost, what, 5 tailbacks in one season?). Yeah, we're thin, but if we can got consistent production from two of those three, we've got a good chance to be in business. On a side note, there hasn't been a lot of chatter about Wells (since recruiting wrapped up), but man was that a great get. I think he just might be able to contribute this year.
     
  13. siebs7

    siebs7 Newbie

    Don't forget Anderson Russel will be able to provide some depth also
     
  14. IronBuckI

    IronBuckI Calmer than you are.

    Sammy was already gone. JaJa still wouldn't have been on the two deep. We didn't stop pursuing elite RB's. They stopped considering us as an option, figuring they couldn't crack the two-deep until their junior or senior seasons.
     

Share This Page