• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Former Hockey Players Sue Michigan Over Alleged Sexualized Hazing

ScriptOhio

Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.

Former hockey players sue Michigan over alleged sexualized hazing

Sixteen former Michigan hockey players sued the university Wednesday, alleging that the team's former coaches and other school employees turned a blind eye to decades of ritualized hazing that was sexual in nature.

The complaint says the hockey players, who attended Michigan between 1984 and 2001, had their genitals and other parts of their bodies shaved by upperclassmen, were anally penetrated with razor handles and were forced to complete other humiliating acts while nude at parties as part of their initiation to the team as freshmen.

The complaint alleges that Hall of Fame former coach Red Berenson condoned the hazing rituals and punished at least one player who complained. Then-assistant coach Mel Pearson, who later took over as the Wolverines' head coach, was also among several team employees who allegedly knew about the hazing and told freshmen to "just get through it," according to the lawsuit.

The 16 players, all of whom are anonymous John Does in the lawsuit, filed their case seeking financial damages in federal court in Detroit. The complaint says the players started discussing their hazing experiences in September 2024 and learned that the rituals were more widespread than they had realized.

Pearson did not respond to ESPN's requests for comment. Berenson denied the allegation that coaches encouraged the hazing activities in an interview with MLive on Thursday.

"We knew there was a certain element of initiation on our team, and it was usually orchestrated by the seniors," Berenson told MLive. "We didn't promote it. We didn't encourage it."

A university spokesman called the allegations "disturbing" but said many elements of the lawsuits were "misleading" because Michigan has had an anti-hazing policy in place since 1982.

"The former student athletes, who attended the university more than 25 years ago, describe behavior at the hands of fellow teammates that allegedly happened in the 1980s and 1990s," spokesman Paul Corliss said in a statement provided to ESPN. "To the extent that any former student-athlete engaged in hazing or other misconduct, they were violating university policy. The university denies that it is any way responsible or liable for the claims alleged."

Berenson, 86, won two national championships in the 1990s as Michigan's head coach following a decorated career as a player in the NHL. He retired as Michigan's coach in 2017. The players in the lawsuit claim that it was a well-known team tradition to haze the freshmen by shaving their genitals in the team locker room at the start of their season. They claim Berenson told players to make sure they only shaved "below the neck" to keep the ritual hidden, according to the complaint.

Berenson told reporters in 2012 that he was stopping any hazing on the team, but referred then only to examples of freshmen carrying the upperclassmen's equipment bags and some instances where his "captains got too carried away."

Some of the players in the lawsuit said their pubic hair was removed with a blowtorch. Others said their penis was tied to a helmet or five-gallon bucket, which older players filled with hockey pucks.

The former players said that equipment managers and team trainers were present for the alleged abuse during some years, according to the lawsuit. One of the players said he reported the abuse to the university's athletic director. The lawsuit doesn't name the athletic director. The player said Berenson responded by "drastically" cutting his playing time.

Michigan hired an outside law firm in 2022 to investigate separate concerns about the culture of the hockey program under Pearson's leadership. He left the team when his contract expired shortly after that investigation was completed.

Michigan's athletic department has been the subject of several lawsuits related to sexual impropriety in recent years. The school fired its head football coach Sherrone Moore in December after he was accused of threatening a team employee after having an affair with her. This summer, the university reached a $1.2 million settlement with a woman who accused a former Michigan football staffer of sexual assault.

Matt Weiss, another former football coach, was fired in 2023 and later indicted for hacking into student online accounts to download intimate photos and videos. In January 2022, Michigan paid $490 million to settle hundreds of claims that former team doctor Robert Anderson had sexually assaulted athletes during a nearly four-decade span working with the university.

In late 2025, the university commissioned an independent investigation into the culture of its athletic department, which found that issues were not "widespread." Michigan announced shortly after the investigation concluded that athletic director Warde Manuel will step down at the end of the year.
 
n late 2025, the university commissioned an independent investigation into the culture of its athletic department, which found that issues were not "widespread." Michigan announced shortly after the investigation concluded that athletic director Warde Manuel will step down at the end of the year.

i-do-not-think-it-means-what-you-think-it-means.jpg
 
Upvote 0
Having watched, year in and year out, how Berenson's players were the most chippy, cheap-shot artists in college hockey, I'm beginning to understand why. They had some serious anger issues to deal with. Still a bunch of bitches though.

Fuck Berenson. Glad he lived long enough to get dragged through the mud. Hopefully, he won't pull a Paterno and conveniently die so he doesn't have to deal with the fallout.
 
Upvote 0

16 former Michigan hockey players sue university over alleged sexualized hazing

The plaintiffs are using pseudonyms because the allegations are so sensitive​

Sixteen former University of Michigan men’s hockey players sued the university and its governing board Wednesday, alleging coaches and staff knew about, facilitated, and concealed years of sexualized hazing within the program.

The complaint alleges freshmen were subjected to forced genital shaving, sexual touching, simulated sex acts, threats of sexual assault, forced drinking, and other humiliating conduct.

Some plaintiffs allege they were subjected to anal penetration with razor handles and had their genitals tied to hockey helmets or buckets weighted with pucks.

The allegations have not been proven in court.

The lawsuit names the University of Michigan and the university’s Board of Regents as defendants.

It alleges they violated Title IX, the federal law prohibiting sex discrimination in education, by maintaining a policy of deliberate indifference to sexualized hazing and failing to investigate or stop it.

The plaintiffs allege longtime coach Red Berenson knew about the hazing and directed players to conduct some activities inside hockey facilities and to shave players “from the neck down.”

Berenson coached Michigan from 1984 to 2017. Mel Pearson, who served as an assistant coach and later as head coach, is also accused of knowing about the conduct and failing to intervene.

The complaint says some players who objected or reported the hazing were told to be a “Michigan man” or a “good teammate.”

It also alleges players feared retaliation, including reduced playing time, loss of scholarships, and damage to their professional hockey prospects.

The lawsuit points to a 1980 hazing incident involving Michigan hockey players that was publicly reported and resulted in suspensions.

It alleges the university had notice of the risk of violent hazing before the conduct described by the plaintiffs began.

In 2012, Berenson publicly announced an end to freshman hazing in the hockey program.

According to the lawsuit, he described the remaining traditions as relatively minor but acknowledged that some captains had “got too carried away.”

The plaintiffs allege the university failed to investigate those comments or disclose the extent of the alleged conduct.

The lawsuit says the former players began comparing accounts in 2024 and learned that similar practices had occurred across multiple classes.

They allege they did not understand at the time that the conduct constituted sexual abuse or that university officials may have known about and condoned it.

The former Michigan Wolverines hockey players seek damages for physical and emotional injuries, lost educational and professional opportunities, lost earnings, medical expenses, and other losses.

They also seek attorney fees, punitive and liquidated damages, and an order requiring sexualized-hazing prevention training for Michigan athletes.

The university and the Board of Regents had not filed responses to the complaint as of Wednesday.

“The allegations outlined in the plaintiffs’ complaint are disturbing, but many elements of the complaint are misleading.
The former student athletes, who attended the university more than 25 years ago, describe behavior at the hands of fellow teammates that allegedly happened in the 1980s and 1990s.
To the extent any former student athlete engaged in hazing or other misconduct, they were violating university policy.
The university denies that it is any way responsible or liable for the claims alleged.
The university first adopted an official anti-hazing policy in 1982.
It was one of the first universities in the country to do so, and it has earned its standing as a leader in this area.
Today, all university student athletes are required to complete annual training on university policies and protections against hazing, discrimination, and other forms of misconduct.
We are committed to an environment of safety for all of our students.

Just sayin': Two interesting items here.....

1. Re: players who objected or reported the hazing were told to be a “Michigan man”.
We have a new definition of a "Michigan man"...... :lol:

2. Re: The university denies that it is any way responsible or liable for the claims alleged.
Even though it happened on university property, the acts reportedly had the knowledge of scUM employees, and the acts were reported and (basically) scUM did nothing about it; another typical scUM denial of any responsibility/liability......:no:
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top