Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Simply skip over my posts like I skip over you'rs if I don't agree. But last time I checked everyone is entitled to their own opinon and I am not attacking or bashing people like you are to me.BB73;908935; said:I'm assuming the pictures of Janelle are already in a Romper Room thread.
BB73;908928; said:I just glanced over that first post, but here's what I got out of it.
21 is complaining about a shrunken love-sac.
Can they charge a restocking fee on a defective item?
(he even got mouthy, then screamed at Janelle and I, to the point where she broke out in tears...).
osugrad21;908903; said:I have a very quick legal question... Two, actually...
I bought an item a month ago, a LoveSac. It's basically a giant beanbag that costs $400. They are filled with foam and shrunk down from 8ft in diameter to about twice the size of a computer monitor and it fits in a duffel bag. When you get it home, you fluff it up and it's 8ft in diameter. There's a lifetime warranty on the foam inside, and a 1 year warranty on the cover.
When I bought it, they told me that I would be able to shrink it back down by vacuuming the air out. They never told me that there were two bags of material that were put in one giant cover. They never informed me about the return policy or the restocking fee, and there were no signs in the store indicating this policy. The restocking fee was mentioned on the receipt, but I didn't get the receipt until AFTER I made the purchase and they had my money.
Well, when they brought it out to the car, I saw that it was in two duffel bags, so it's two pieces that go in one giant cover. When we got it home and fluffed it up, we realized that the bag had no vacuum seal on it, so we couldn't vacuum the air out. Come to find out, they don't have vacuum seal-able bags, the girl just lied to us. Basically, the thing was so big that it takes up our entire van, which is a big deal when you consider that we're supposed to move home in a week, and we have an entire apartment full of stuff, plus the lovesac, that we're supposed to take home.
The two inserts is a big deal, because instead of being a giant beanbag, it's two beanbags in a giant bag. When Janelle and I would sit on it, she would be 6 inches higher than I was, when we're supposed to be level. That's because of the two inserts...if it were just one, we'd be level. Their website says "insert," not inserts.
In the store, the sacs are very comfortable, when you sit down, the pieces of foam are very small and it feels almost like gel. When you get up, they spring back to where they were, and you only have to fluff them once a day. Our lovesac was very very lumpy, when I would sit in it, I would be just a couple inches from the ground. You had to fluff it every hour or so, and the consistency was like a feather pillow instead of the gel bag in the store. Very very uncomfortable.
Well, last night, the zipper broke on the cover. Broke off. We decided to take the thing back to the store, since the entire thing was defective and we had been lied to.
When we got there, they offered us a refund, but told us that there was a 25% restocking fee. The manager admitted that both the insert and the cover were defective.
Is this legal? Can they charge a restocking fee on a defective item?
Also, Janelle paid for it, and she is leaving for a wedding tomorrow, so she wanted the money then. They gave us the option of leaving it in the store while we took the issue up with customer service, because the manager refused to budge on the policy (he even got mouthy, then screamed at Janelle and I, to the point where she broke out in tears...). Janelle decided to take the refund, minus the 25% restocking fee, and we are going to call the corporate office tomorrow.
What I want to know about that is did we screw ourselves out of the possibility of getting the rest of the refund, the restocking fee, if these people did indeed violate the law and we would otherwise be entitled to a refund?
I already looked at the Uniform Commercial Code, and it seems that they are guilty of false advertising and fraud, but I am obviously not a lawyer.
Thanks for any advice you can give!
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;908938; said:Simply skip over my posts like I skip over you'rs if I don't agree. But last time I checked everyone is entitled to their own opinon and I am not attacking or bashing people like you are to me.
That's true but my response was a reaction to some prior posts which almost guarantees Martin to us. No such guarantee can be a certainty until he announces and makes it a reality. To count out other colleges such as ND is foolish. You can obviously say he is swaying to us but to say he's in our back pocket is crazy to me. Don't get me wrong I really want Martin and I hope we get him but to be so confident that he is committing and it won't go south is nutsBB73;908941; said:If I put you on ignore, I'd miss most of the posts on these boards!
If you don't like want they say just skip the post. They aren't forcing you to reading.BB73;908941; said:If I put you on ignore, I'd miss most of the posts on these boards!
Any more news on John Clay?jwinslow;908946; said:If you don't like want they say just skip the post. They aren't forcing you to reading.
21 said:When Janelle and I would sit on it, she would be 6 inches higher than I was, when we're supposed to be level.
I don't have any problems with it because the Scum are the second best team. I have no doubt we will kick their butt twice in one year.BB73;908948; said:More bitching. Because she's 6 inches above him, he apparently can't have sex with her using his shrunken love-sac.
Thump;908932; said:Purchasing anything called a lovesac is beyond retribution.
Big Papa;908940; said:This doesn't have anything to do with having sex with a turkey does it?
BB73;908957; said:That's not what 21 uses this for (think shrunken love-sac):