• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Did you vote today?


  • Total voters
    107
If you haven't voted yet you better hurry:

POLL CLOSING TIMES
corner.left.top.gif

icon.7.gif
7 p.m. ET
Georgia, Indiana, Kentucky, South Carolina, Vermont, Virginia
icon.730.gif
7:30 p.m. ET
North Carolina, Ohio, West Virginia
icon.8.gif
8 p.m. ET
Alabama, Connecticut, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Oklahoma, Pensylvania, Tennessee
icon.830.gif
8:30 p.m. ET
Arkansas
icon.9.gif
9 p.m. ET
Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Minnesota, Nebraska, New Mexico, New York, North Dakota, Rhode Island, South Dakota, Texas, Wisconsin, Wyoming
icon.10.gif
10 p.m. ET
Iowa, Montana, Nevada, Utah
icon.11.gif
11 p.m. ET
California, Hawaii, Idaho, Oregon, Washington
icon.1.gif
1 a.m. ET
Alaska


Source: Associated Press
shdr.wh.poll.closing.gif
All times Eastern
map.close.times.gif


The times on this page represent the last poll closing time in each state. Fourteen states are in multiple time zones and some of these states have different poll closing times. For more detailed information on the exact poll closing time in your area or precinct, visit the Web site for your state's secretary of state.

In most cases, no results will be released until after the last poll closing time for the state. However, in five states with multiple time zones -- Florida, Indiana, Kentucky, Michigan and Texas -- results may be available for certain House races in the state's earlier time zone. However, no races will be called until all the polls in the state have closed.



http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2006/pages/results/misc/poll.close.html
 
Upvote 0
Voting is currently kicking Not-voting's ass. Though you'd think that someone that wouldn't vote in a somewhat important national election wouldn't vote here in a poll either; hence the scewage. And to the folks that voted "No" here, how come you'll vote here but not where it really matters?

It gives me smiles to see that Abe Lincoln didn't vote. Seems appropriate somehow.
 
Upvote 0
MightbeaBuck;655367; said:
And to the folks that voted "No" here, how come you'll vote here but not where it really matters?

The elections will come and go, the sun will come up tomorrow, and I'll quickly forget how annoying the constant campaign ads were. To put it simply, I have no desire to vote because I really don't think it matters. I'm not trying to be purposefully argumentative, but would my casting a vote actually help eliminate terrorism? Or loosen the cuffs on stem cell research? Or make health care more accessible to those who truly need it? The changes that really matter don't happen over the course of a single election. If I were a more transcendental person, I'd simply say that this election is a micron of pus on a little pimple on the ass of an entire body of human existence, and it will clear up in no time; that it is, like many other things people do on a daily basis are, just one in a line of many distractions and follies that keep us convinced of our own importance. Casting a vote in a major election to me is like investing a dollar in a scratch-off ticket. There's a 95% chance it was a complete waste of time, a 4.9999% chance I break even, and a 0.0001% chance I feel good about the expenditure of time/money/effort. Call me a bum, call me a malcontent, but I'm fairly certain that I could live my entire life, not vote one single time, and be able to say at the end of it all that I'm satisfied with the outcome.

I hope that answers your question.
 
Upvote 0
vr, you're a bum and a malcontent. Hey, I was just following your instructions. :biggrin:

I voted, in order to justify my right to bitch about things for another 2 years. (I was in Thump's camp on that recent thread).

It is a relief to not have the commercials anymore. It seems they get more negative all the time - it's a shame negative campaigning works.

And this will mercifully end the numerous recorded phone calls. Or did Laura Bush call me personally?
 
Upvote 0
vrbryant;655394; said:
The elections will come and go, the sun will come up tomorrow, and I'll quickly forget how annoying the constant campaign ads were. To put it simply, I have no desire to vote because I really don't think it matters. I'm not trying to be purposefully argumentative, but would my casting a vote actually help eliminate terrorism? Or loosen the cuffs on stem cell research? Or make health care more accessible to those who truly need it? The changes that really matter don't happen over the course of a single election. If I were a more transcendental person, I'd simply say that this election is a micron of pus on a little pimple on the ass of an entire body of human existence, and it will clear up in no time; that it is, like many other things people do on a daily basis are, just one in a line of many distractions and follies that keep us convinced of our own importance. Casting a vote in a major election to me is like investing a dollar in a scratch-off ticket. There's a 95% chance it was a complete waste of time, a 4.9999% chance I break even, and a 0.0001% chance I feel good about the expenditure of time/money/effort. Call me a bum, call me a malcontent, but I'm fairly certain that I could live my entire life, not vote one single time, and be able to say at the end of it all that I'm satisfied with the outcome.

I hope that answers your question.
After reading your whole rant......thanks for not voting.:biggrin:
 
Upvote 0
Buck36;655402; said:
After reading your whole rant......thanks for not voting.:biggrin:

A mini-rant, if a rant at all. But it wasn't unprovoked.

You make a good point, though. I don't care enough to sufficiently educate myself about the issues. My ignorance to most of the line items (correct usage?) is further justification of my abstinence. I actually received a couple commendations today for this very reason: it's better that I not vote at all than to vote uninformed. Perhaps that's part of my motivation (or lack thereof)--the fact that everyone's vote counts the same is a slap to the face of every man and woman who actually pays attention, and doesn't just - and I'm quoting from a friend - "vote for everyone with an (R) next to their name."
 
Upvote 0
When Poll Workers Lose Their Cool - KY

Thought it was time with polls closing to throw in some of the better election day oddities - First we go to Kentucky, where voting it seems is taken wa-ay too seriously by some poll workers.

Ky. poll worker charged with assault

Tue Nov 7, 3:32 PM ET

A poll worker was arrested Tuesday and charged with assault and interfering with an election for allegedly choking a voter and pushing him out the door, officials said.
It apparently started as a dispute between the two over marking the ballot, said Lt. Col. Carl Yates of the Jefferson County sheriff's office.
The voter told poll worker Jeffery Steitz that he didn't want to vote in a judicial election because he didn't know enough about the candidates, but Steitz told him he had to vote in the race anyway, Yates said.
Steitz, 42, eventually grabbed the man by the neck and threw him out of the polling place, Yates said.
"The poor guy went back in and he threw him out again," Yates said. "At least it wasn't over a Democrat or a Republican being on the ballot."
Election officials called police.
"That about tops off the day," said Paula McCraney, a spokeswoman for the Jefferson County clerk's office.
There was no immediate response to a call seeking comment from Steitz at his home.
In Pennsylvania, a would-be voter was arrested at a polling place in Allentown, where election workers said he smashed an electronic voting machine with a paperweight.
Authorities didn't know what caused the outburst. "He came in here very peaceably and showed his ID, then he got on the machine and just snapped," volunteer Gladys Pezoldt told The Morning Call of Allentown.
The machine's screen was damaged and it was not immediately clear if votes recorded on the machine could be retrieved. Police said the man faced charges of felony criminal mischief and tampering with voting machines.
 
Upvote 0
I'm the Governor Dammit! (You've Seen Me on TV) - SC

In continuing coverage of election day oddities we call upon South Carolina.
Here the rules regarding voting also require ID (like the Buckeye State) guess who was without picture ID? That's right, none other than the State's own governor!

S.C. governor turned away by poll worker

By JIM DAVENPORT, Associated Press WriterTue Nov 7, 1:53 PM ET

Even Gov. Mark Sanford needs the right ID to vote in South Carolina. One day after eye injuries interrupted his last day of campaigning, Sanford forgot his voter registration card and was turned away from the polls, returning 90 minutes later to cast his ballot.
"I hope my luck turns," Sanford said. "Yesterday, I had the eye issue, today I was absentminded and didn't have my voter registration card."
Poll workers at a Sullivans Island precinct turned the governor away when he didn't have his registration card and the driver's license he showed had a Columbia address. He returned later with a new card.
"I hope everybody else out there is as determined to vote as I was today," he said.
On Monday, Sanford was sidelined from campaigning after he burned his eyes under stage lighting at an economic development event a day earlier.
"It's behind me and the prognosis is good," Sanford said before he was first turned away.
With his eyes red and watery, Sanford hoped his bid for a second term turned more on the image he's nurtured for four years as an outsider taking on political insiders.
Along the way to Tuesday's election, the Republican found himself repairing rifts with GOP voters stung by his vetoes or other party faithful turned off by what they called his libertarian leanings.
But it's doubtful Sanford's day off did much to help Democratic challenger Tommy Moore's prospects.
Moore has raised just $3 million to win the office. That's less than half of the more than $8 million Sanford gathered. The difference left Sanford on television nonstop through the summer, giving him the edge in defining the contest and himself, and Moore was unable to answer until mid-October.
Sanford says the race is about the state's future, including efforts he'll continue to cut spending, cut taxes, push school choice and restructure and streamline government. Moore seized on the state's unemployment rate ? for more than a year one of the nation's highest ? and Sanford's push for school vouchers.
That issue has polarized some voters.
School administrator Odell Stuckey, 62, said his mind was made up a long time ago.
"I'm totally against vouchers for private education," said Stuckey, of Richland County. "I support public money for public education."
The unemployment rate also has been an issue that Sanford has tried to downplay by talking about employment growth. It gave rise to Moore's mantra that Sanford "sees numbers, I see people."
Early on, Sanford's campaign tagged Moore, a Clearwater Democrat, as a "28-year, liberal, Columbia insider."
Earning and nurturing that outsider image has riled Republicans, prompting Sanford to wrap up his campaign with ads telling voters he's willing to lose votes to take the state where it needs to go. Tuesday's contest becomes a measure of whether those he peeved will stay with him.
Some left months ago to support Sanford's primary opponent, Oscar Lovelace, a Prosperity family practice doctor. Lovelace road a wave of anti-Sanford sentiment to win 35 percent of the vote and carried Lexington County, a GOP stronghold, after Sanford vetoed a heart center there.
After the primary, Republicans for Moore groups sprouted around the state, giving structure to the anti-Sanford sentiment.
Sanford said he won't have to worry about voting for himself anymore ? this is his last campaign.
"I was telling the boys this is a fairly significant event in our little family," he said of his wife and four boys. "This is the end of the road."
______
Sanford, 46, is a self-styled, penny-pinching maverick who served three terms in the U.S. House, stepping down to honor a term-limit pledge. The Fort Lauderdale, Fla., native developed a reputation for voting against even the most popular legislation, including projects in his own district, and sleeping on a futon in his House office.
After Sanford graduated from college, he worked at a New York investment banking concern and got into real estate. In early 2001, he entered what would become a GOP crowded field with eight candidates eager to take on Democrat Gov. Jim Hodges. He easily beat former Lt. Gov. Bob Peeler ? a favorite of the state's established GOP base ? and defeated Hodges in the November election with 54 percent of the vote.
Moore, 56, is known as the state Senate's biggest dealmaker. He's been a a fixture on conference committees that have worked out final compromises on the state lottery, sweetening incentives for film makers and changing ethics laws.
He's the founder and owner of Boiler Efficiency Inc. in Clearwater.
Moore grew up in a small mill town near Aiken, delivered newspapers and worked behind a drug store's soft-drink and ice-cream counter. When he was in elementary school, he told a teacher he would be serving in the state House one day. He did that between 1979 and 1980 before winning the Senate seat he's held since 1981.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top