sparcboxbuck
What happened to my ¤cash?
"Hind sight is 20-20".
To a point those governing can only react to what is known. If you start with "knowing" little you may assume the worse. When lives are assumed to be at stake what do you do? You're cautious. Good governance would adjust as facts are gained. In theory that is. In the real world what happens? A mix of good and bad judgement. If you are responsible for the lives of 12 million people what would you do?
I sure as shit wouldn’t take the Goebbels approach that Dewine and Acton did. If that article is right, in full or in part, Dewine pulled the wool over everyone’s eyes. And if that’s true, how many others did the same?
You can stop being an apologist for them at any point.
Upvote
0