Counting "probable" cases without any positive test results is not simply "wrong results", nor "even a few percentages of errors". No one here is saying there's some "massive worldwide conspiracy", but it's pretty fucking clear that there are entities that go out of there way to count as many COVID cases and deaths as they possibly can.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/14/nyregion/new-york-coronavirus-deaths.html
That's two right off the top of my head.
I'm just going to be frank and say I don't have time to continue to parse out all of this shit after this one because 5 more of these videos will pop up and it leads to a never-ending rabbit hole to chase down and disprove and you won't accept any of it.
This video was posted in late April. Not sure when the actual statement by her was made. There are numerous other articles and statements by this doctor that talk about reviewing the death counts and trying to figure out direct causes compared to contributing causes.
Ezike said that the state is being careful to make sure to weed out deaths where the patient had COVID-19, but died in a manner completely separate from the virus, such as a gunshot wound or a motor vehicle crash.
“We will continue to work to provide, quickly and responsibly and accurately, what we are in fact seeing here in Illinois,” she said.
If they're trying to boost death counts, why weed these out and why on earth bring any of this up?
The problem with COVID is that we are still figuring it out and don't understand the full implications of an infection, to the point of people having strokes or developing adjacent respiratory illnesses. If someone develops pneumonia due to catching COVID, and technically dies of the pneumonia, do you classify it as COVID or pneumonia? Don't know, don't care. To me, COVID is causing so many complications that I would never want to deal with it even if I have a super slim chance of dying.
I can't go through every death certificate and trace back patient history to figure out exact reasons for death, that's hard enough for doctors. My grandfather died from his cancer coming back, but at the time he was also fighting a staph infection and was taking medication to slow congestive heart failure. What killed him? Probably all 3, but the cancer is what finally pushed him over the edge. Is there a plan to boost cancer deaths to boost fundraising and scare monger about cancer? Of course not.
This shit is complicated, and skepticism is understandable at first. But at some point people need to accept that this is happening, this is incredibly serious, and energy spent trying to parse out certain deaths to argue that the death count is slightly lower is wasted. You could also argue the death rate, especially early on, was far higher than recorded due to people not understanding the symptoms and side effects. Also, comparative death rates from 2020 compared to years previous shows a disparity of ~10-20k. At best, it'd be a wash.