• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Coronavirus (COVID-19) is too exciting for adults to discuss (CLOSED)

Status
Not open for further replies.
We live in the third most populous county in the world. Millions of people have already had it and recovered. Everyone seems to forget that the people who wind up hospitalized are a small minority of the total cases. The reasons that millions of people didn't get tested are 1) because tests weren't widely available until ~10 days ago, and 2) because they weren't sick enough to warrant a hospital visit.

30,000 people have died from the flu since October. 2400 people have died from coronavirus.
There are others reasons besides those two but we can't get into that here.

I think it's very possible more have it undetected. That lower percentage does not change the threat of overloading the hospitals, a possible which we've addressed for about 0.5 business days.

It may be a far faster spreading, less fatal disease. That data was something we needed to be interested in getting. Then we could have poured money into industry and healthcare to prepare for it.
 
Upvote 0
I think it's very possible more have it undetected. That lower percentage does not change the threat of overloading the hospitals, a possible which we've addressed for about 0.5 business days.
It's not "possible", but now pretty much a given, with the spike in detected cases coinciding with the increase in tests. And while the "lower percentage does not change the threat of overloading the hospitals", I think that with social distancing and increasing "herd immunity", the chances of any hospital overload drops significantly. If any overload at all happens, it will likely happen in only a very few places, such as NYC.

*English, do I speak it?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
It's not "possible", but now pretty much a given, with the spike in detected cases coinciding with the increase in tests. And while the "lower percentage does not change the threat of overloading the hospitals", I think that with social distancing and increasing "herd immunity", the chances of any hospital over load drops significantly.
I would feel better if we were actually social distancing consistently, but you gotta make those spring break dollas, so we've centralized all of our transmission into one low-rent vacation destination.
If there any overload at all happens, it will likely happen in only a very few places, such as NYC.
Based on what?
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top