The Buckeye Planet 2011 Conference Re-Draft:
Nate G: Ohio State, LSU, Oklahoma, Virginia Tech, Tennessee, U Conn, Illinois, Northwestern, Maryland, Kansas St, Oregon St, Villanova
Mrstickball: Florida, Penn State, Georgia, Wisconsin, WVU, BYU, Arizona St., Minnesota, Texas Tech, Baylor, Indiana, Iowa St
AKAKBUCK: Texas, Alabama, Nebraska, Miami, Washington, Georgia Tech, Iowa, Syracuse, Boston College, Navy, Ole Miss, Army
Diego-Bucks: USC, FSU, Texas A&M, Cal, Arizona, Virginia, Missouri, Kansas, Utah, Rutgers, Louisville, Wake Forest
Muck: Notre Dame, TSUN, North Carolina, UCLA, Duke, Pitt, Clemson, Auburn, Colorado, Purdue, Houston, Cincinnati
SmoovP: Arkansas, Stanford, Oregon, Michigan St, South Carolina, Oklahoma St, TCU, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, NC State, USF, Boise St
Cowboys Ride For Free is in the middle of mock draft by SB Nation bloggers building new college conferences from scratch.
C&P from the initial post...
If there is one universal in college athletics it is that all fans believe that the NCAA has done 90% of things incorrectly. The latest and most prolific of these second guesses being the configuration of the conferences. Well we are here to re-draft all that, and to invent teleporting while we are at it... bear with me here.
A few weeks ago I had an idea to basically treat all the NCAA schools and athletic programs as free agents, with 6 commissioners holding a fantasy style draft to fill up their empty conferences. Thanks to some overwhelmingly positive response from many of my SB Nation blogging peers, this idea developed and became what you will read below: The SB Nation Conference Re-Draft Project.
GAME OBJECTIVES
The purposes of the fantasy draft are: (1) to explore the values of individual schools by drafting them sequentially, and (2) to have fun strategically building a conference of schools.
There will be six conferences, and such conferences are NOT meant to be new versions of current conferences. That is, the objective of the game is not to create tweaked versions of what we already have. The goal is to draft schools based on their overall value, and to compile a conference of teams strategically and coherently.
What makes a school valuable? Well as one of the six conference commissioners, we leave that largely up to you, with a few important guidelines. First, bearing in mind that we are drafting athletics conferences, athletics should be weighted heaviest, if not exclusively.
While obviously we must consider athletics, the following are factors you may, but are not required to consider:
Academics
Co-eds
Weather/Desirability of Destination
Historic Success
Traditions
TV Revenue Potential
Ethics
Rivalries (two teams)
On the flipside, for purposes of this game there are two factors that are NOT to be considered. First, do not take travel/geographic concerns into consideration (I told you we invented teleporting). In real life, Washington and Florida are unrealistic conference partners; in our world, that doesn't matter -- neither from a travel or time zone standpoint. Second, and related, while we may take individual rivalries into consideration (e.g. pairing Michigan and Ohio State), preservation of current conference history/rivalry/alliance is not to be considered. Hopefully for obvious reasons.
Finally, the goal is not to improve the status quo. The goal is not to create a conference that will actually play games. The goal is to use a draft to value schools and have fun strategically grouping them together.
In sum, there is no single way that schools must be valued and/or grouped together. Some may wish to create the best conference of all-around athletics-academics combination. Others may want to create a revenue superpower. There are any number of valid ways to do this. The only limitation is not creating a group that is based on regional and historical ties. Time to wipe the slate clean and start over.
Would anyone be interested in doing something similar here on BP?
