Can’t really consider a backup until they have a starter. While the market price for a starting C seems to have really zoomed in the past month, some of the comments from the Cleveland front office have been very curious. Here’s what I mean :
) I have not read a single mention of Bryan Lavastida. He opened 2022 with a couple weeks on the temporarily larger 28 man ML active roster while Mille was on the IL, then split the rest of the season at AAA CBus, AA Akron and the IL. On paper it seems like a lost year after he had a pretty impressive 2021. Looks like he is the longest of long shots to start 2023 in Cleveland as the backup or starter.
) Antonette and Tito have both been quoted saying nearly the exact same things about Bo Naylor: that the future is so bright for him but they just “don’t know” whether he’s ready to start every day at the ML level for them yet. Reads like it is carefully scripted? Last time I saw this kind of talk about a Cleveland catching prospect was for Francisco Majia…. right before they traded him.
Know if he’s ready? Naylor has caught 56 games (and DH for 10 games) at AAA, all in 2022. Baltimore’s new C Adley Rutschman only had 55 AAA games before coming up in 2022 and so far has been pretty, pretty good! (Rutshman was drafted 1st pick, 1st round from college in 2019 and is about a year older than Bo, who was drafted out of high school by Cleveland in 1st round, 29th pick in 2018, so their experience levels are not exactly as close as just the AAA catching might suggest.) My guess is they are not nearly as unsure as they’re talking. They know. I think the odds that Bo makes the Opening Day roster in Cleveland are only slightly better than Lavastida’s chances.
) Which leaves the team with? Right now only somebody they acquire. If the reports of what Oakland is asking for Sean Murphy are accurate, it will be really out of character for Cleveland to bring him in. I’d love to see him join the team but if he does it might be coupled with Bo being traded ….maybe in another deal.
Toronto reportedly will trade a C, but none of them look like a long term solution and seem too expensive to give up major prospects (yep, plural). Here are the free agent Cs:
https://www.mlb.com/news/mlb-2022-23-free-agents-by-position
See anyone better than Hedgy, from a value perspective?
Notice the Reds made an early signing that looks like a good value pick now.