• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Capital One Bowl: Michigan 41, Florida 35 (final)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
PennState1985;1021026; said:
I actually don't get how Penn State lost that one. Looked like they brought in the seconds stringers after the fake FG was ran in and forgot to bring the first stringers back out again.
Click to expand...

I'm sure if you think hard enough you can point to some toe being out of bounds, or the refs having it out for you. Search your feelings.

Curtis Enis does my laundry.
 
Upvote 0
PennState1985;1020920; said:
2005: Two seconds were added onto the clock for no good reason, and Michigan won the game with negative-one seconds on the clock when Mario Manningham caught a pass while his foot was out of bounds.
Click to expand...

Since you know so much about this game, you do know Paterno also got 2 seconds back in that game too, right?
 
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;1021041; said:
Since you know so much about this game, you do know Paterno also got 2 seconds back in that game too, right?
Click to expand...

So I've heard, and if it's true, he shouldn't have either. It's not standard practice to add time on after a timeout is called. I ONLY saw it happen in the Michigan game.

So really there should have been 4 less seconds on the clock if what you say is true.
 
Upvote 0
PennState1985;1021046; said:
So I've heard, and if it's true, he shouldn't have either. It's not standard practice to add time on after a timeout is called. I ONLY saw it happen in the Michigan game.

So really there should have been 4 less seconds on the clock if what you say is true.
Click to expand...

A tip...don't leave a receiver wide open on an "and goal" play. Just throwin that out there.

Haha that's the game King fell flat on his face trying to cover Mario. If you were as good as you say you were, you would have been able to beat us.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeNation27;1021030; said:
Let me go ahead and correct your stupidity for you.

1. When a coach calls time out with time left on the clock, and the ref grants a time out with time left on the clock....no matter how many seconds tick off the clock, they get put back on.
2. I know the 2005 was your's and every other douchebag Penn State fan's greatest moment in life, but that game was anything but a destruction. I'm glad that beating Ohio State by a TD means that much to your pathetic fan base though....it just shows where the 2 programs really are.
3. USC and Texas were unbeaten #1 and #2. You actually could have destroyed Ohio State (you didn't, by the way) along with Michigan, and you still would have been left out of the Rose Bowl.
4. You're dumb.
Click to expand...

1. I only saw that happen once, the Michigan game. Never seen seconds added on before because a timeout was called.
2. Wrong! The 1994 season was the greatest, of course I only remember a couple games from it (that was before I became a huge football fan), but I do remember Penn State winning the Rose Bowl and Ohio State being handed one of it's worst embarassments ever, if not its worst.
3. I somehow doubt it, but these "what if" games can't be proven right or wrong.
4. No.
 
Upvote 0
PennState1985 said:
So I've heard, and if it's true, he shouldn't have either. It's not standard practice to add time on after a timeout is called. I ONLY saw it happen in the Michigan game.

So really there should have been 4 less seconds on the clock if what you say is true.
Click to expand...
So wait.....in your I've-only-watched-football-for-3-years opinion, you think if somebody calls a time out...and the clock keeps running...it's tough shit?

note to self: get a job as time keeper for the NC game, wait until Ohio State has the lead, and just run the clock for the rest of the game. it's bullet proof.
 
Upvote 0
SNIPER26;1021053; said:
A tip...don't leave a receiver wide open on an "and goal" play. Just throwin that out there.

Haha that's the game King fell flat on his face trying to cover Mario. If you were as good as you say you were, you would have been able to beat us.
Click to expand...

Hey, you go oh fer nine and see if you don't make excuses.
 
Upvote 0
PennState1985;1020920; said:
2005: Two seconds were added onto the clock for no good reason, and Michigan won the game with negative-one seconds on the clock when Mario Manningham caught a pass while his foot was out of bounds.
Click to expand...
You almost had me. You really did. See, I was at a noisy bar full of Notre Dame fans when the game was played and UM-PSU was on a small, silent screen, with the big screens and at least half the other TV's blaring Notre Dame-USC. So I have no idea what happened with the clock.

But really now. I did, after all, see the play, and I promise you, Mario wasn't anywhere near the end line. See below. Yellow circle is Manningham, well after having caught the ball. The zebra in the back is raising his hands to signal touchdown.

pennstate2005.jpg
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top