wdg01
Heisman
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8821schwab said:Can anyone post this highlight on this thread or else point me to where I can see it again?
First clip, right click and save.
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
http://www.buckeyeplanet.com/forum/showthread.php?t=8821schwab said:Can anyone post this highlight on this thread or else point me to where I can see it again?
Good answer, and I appreciate your thoughtfulness, but it could not possibly be 10:01.999. The clock counts down, not up. I say conservative, because, if anything, there are already a few hundredths into the 10:01-to-10:00 second. No possible way the time elapsed between 10:01 and the turning of 9:56 could be even a smidge over 5 seconds. It is almost always a smidge under, thus I say, conservatively, it is 5 seconds flat.wdg01 said:If you wanted to be conservative, you would have assumed it was 10:01 and 99/100ths of a second, which would be closer to what actually played out (1.12 seconds between snap and game clock change).
schwab said:While we're at it, any other highlights that I can relive? This might just tie me over for another <3 months. Your effort is appreciated.
I'm not sure i follow? Maybe I'm to tired... anyway, like i said snap occured at .11 and i attached a picture of where he was at when he reached the 40 and the clock changed to just flipped over to 9:56, just a "smidge" over 5 seconds (number in the lower left hand corner is how far into the clip we are 5.23-.11 =5.12 seconds from snap to 40 yard line)HabaneroBuck said:Good answer, and I appreciate your thoughtfulness, but it could not possibly be 10:01.999. The clock counts down, not up. I say conservative, because, if anything, there are already a few hundredths into the 10:01-to-10:00 second. No possible way the time elapsed between 10:01 and the turning of 9:56 could be even a smidge over 5 seconds. It is almost always a smidge under, thus I say, conservatively, it is 5 seconds flat.
AgreedHabaneroBuck said:But we are just blowing smoke and having fun. Needless to say, Santonio is a burner, and that on the field in pads.
GoBucks459 said:Okay guys, I was thinking the other day how much talent we have at the WR position, and I'm wondering from you fellow buckeye fans who are gonna be the big guns in the WR corps this yr besides the usual suspects as in Ginn and Santonio.....as far as I know for WR here's who we got
Ted Ginn jr (soph)
Santonio Holmes (jr.)
Roy Hall (jr.)
Tony Gonzales (jr.)
Albert Dukes (soph?)
Devon Lyons (soph)
now these guys are all fast and all have potential at being key playmakers....now I hear they might move Hall to TE or even maybe in the backfield see what he can do there, guy's got a ton of talent but i Mean at the WR pos besides ginn/holmes Gonzo really stepped it up last yr and is looking for huge playing time this year. I also really like Devon Lyons, he's fast and can be dangerous, I think he can really step up and i hope he gets the opportunity to prove himself this year....also regarding Albert Dukes, hes from Belle Glade, enuf said haha, I believe Fox said last year that Dukes is the best WR on the team PERIOD, and that includes a nice list of gonzo ginn and holmes. From what I hear, Dukes has all the weapons to be a great buckeye wr, and i think he'l really start to step it up when santonio is in the pro's but we'l see....which guys of these ppl do u think will get good reps and what kind of packages will we see different receivers in?
im just excited I cant wait!
BUCKEYE RECEIVING CORPS looking gooood
GOO BUCKS!
exhawg said:...Is there some reason that Jordan hasn't been mentioned here? He's been in the system a couple years and might be a good backup if he can stay healthy.