I like what he has done at Temple and I believe he has a high ceiling as a coach. I think UC should give him a look. But the problem I see with Golden is that I think he winds up as another Dantonio/Kelly and is gone after three years. The three that I want have the potential, in my opinion, to be here longer than that (5 years?) and have success somewhere between Dantonio and Kelly (8-4, 9-3 type seasons). If UC is going to expand Nippert they need a head coach who will see them through. I though kelly would be that guy. Oh, well.
That's the catch-22 isn't it? Cincy fans want to believe that they are making investments that will take them to the next level. Hate to break the news, but the pool of CFB money is exploding and everybody is making those kind of investments. If UC takes a big drop in the standings next year - and a look at their depth chart almost guarantees that they will - the fans quit coming and that investment begins to look questionable.
Outside of TV revenue the driving force is alumni contributions. Cases like Oregon and Oklahoma State are fairly unique. Is there a Cincy sugar daddy with that kind of cash who cares that much about their athletics? And if Cincy did start to make a serious threat to share the power in Ohio there are some big pocketbooks that can open up to counter it. Maybe we can put a dome over the Shoe and use that as a practice facility while we build a new mega-stadium where the Capitol building is now. The buyout of CW should give a hint as to how far motivated alumni dollars can stretch.
I don't see Cincy playing host to a top tier coach for longer than it takes him to update his resume.
Upvote
0