buckeyesin07
Veni. Vidi. Vici.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1059455; said:The Buckeye's scheme was fine. It worked. It just wasn't executed as well as it could have been. A pick and a fumble or two, some bad penalties, a blocked kick (after the robo drop), a great opponent. These are what lost the game. The Buckeyes moved the ball just fine most the night.
Defensively, it occurred to me what the difference is between 02 and now. In 02, it seems to me, the philosophy was "You're not gonna beat us deep very often, so we're gonna take away the short stuff" Much more aggressive. Now OSU seems to be worried about getting beat deep and content to allow the short stuff. LSU did exactly what Florida did.. what Illinois did... dinked and dunked all the way down the field. The did well on 1st down, leaving 2nd and short, and 3rd and short. If there is one adjustment I'd like to see it's to take away the short stuff a little more while trusting the DBs to not get beat deep too often. But... that's just me.
I agree with this. While OSU's offense was not perfect last night, I think it did enough to put OSU in the position to win the game. Unfortunately, when the defense gives up 38, you're not going to win too many games. Two NC games, and the defense has given up a combined 79 points. I agree that at this point it is a matter of the defensive coaching staff implementing a game plan that doesn't work. Too much zone, too much giving up the underneath stuff. At least last night OSU was more aggressive with the blitzing (unlike the Florida game), but blitzing doesn't do much good if the opposing offense can find soft spots in the zone and dump the ball down for a gain of 5-8 yards every time.
Upvote
0