• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

B1G CCG: Sparty +9.5 vs Wisconsin (ov/un 57.5) Sat 8 ET, Fox

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
ScarletnGray 33;2056540; said:
Over/Under for the Rose Bowl should be at about 80... The Wiscy D is bad but they'll be able to pound it on Oregon. If they take the route OSU did in 09/10 (ball control, run clock), it may keep the score down, but that OSU defense was far, far, far, far better than this Wisconsin D.
Click to expand...


We actually had players like B Rolle who could minimize Oregons speed on the edges. Wisconsin is molasses slow. Best of luck Bucky. I'm curious to see what the spread will be in this one.
 
Upvote 0
Bucky32;2053169; said:
Please define "posers".
Click to expand...

Why, sure. From the urban dictionary:

Posers [poh-zerz] n. People who try to fit into a profile they aren't. People who try to give off the impression that they are one thing when they are realy something else (e.g., Wisconsin and Michigan State college football teams).
 
Upvote 0
Just unbelievable how poorly the MSU secondary played. So many of those passes just floated up there and sometimes in double coverage...and the DB/S doesn't turn around or just flat out can't make a play.

Next year, I hope the coaching staff turns Braxton Miller loose, and let him air it out. No reason we shouldn't be putting up 40+ pts. / game on very average Big 10 teams.
 
Upvote 0
Bucknut24;2056605; said:
no, because there still are judgement calls
Click to expand...

They are able to review whether or not a punt was tipped, which would negate a roughing/running into the kicker penalty. It wouldn't have mattered here, but there was a nice look of disbelief on Frank Beamer's face after it looked like a Hokie got a piece of a punt last night but was called for a penalty - it was reviewed and allowed to stand.

I don't like the idea of having replay do anything differently based on how much time is on the clock. If a play is reviewable, it should be reviewable on the game's first play and its last play.
 
Upvote 0
BB73;2056616; said:
They are able to review whether or not a punt was tipped, which would negate a roughing/running into the kicker penalty. It wouldn't have mattered here, but there was a nice look of disbelief on Frank Beamer's face after it looked like a Hokie got a piece of a punt last night but was called for a penalty - it was reviewed and allowed to stand.

I don't like the idea of having replay do anything differently based on how much time is on the clock. If a play is reviewable, it should be reviewable on the game's first play and its last play.
Click to expand...

i agree with tip, but i thought he was talking about any type of penalty (PI, holding, etc)
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top