BuckeyeMac;1629929; said:IMO theres other things we need than a RB first. I didnt mean it like NO not him bc he's a baller, would rather us draft other needs first.
Well, I didn't say to pick him first. I just saw where it said Tate is projected as the No. 9 RB in the draft coming up. Last year, the ninth RB selected was Gartrell Johnson, who was taken with a compensatory pick at the end of the fourth round. I think the Browns can part with a fourth or fifth rounder for a guy like Tate. Going back over the last thirty years or so, you pretty much can't go wrong picking an Auburn RB. Especially over the last decade, they take a backseat to nobody - Texas and Miami included in producing productive NFL players at that position.
I don't think him (or any RB for that matter) should be a priority for the Browns though. That's why I used more passive language like "I wouldn't mind". The Browns have such a dearth of talent at pretty much every position except LT and KR/PR that if you find good talent and value when your pick comes up, you need to take that guy regardless of position.
Upvote
0