• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

Another Bowl Game for San Diego?

BB73

Loves Buckeye History
Staff member
Bookie
'16 & '17 Upset Contest Winner
Another Bowl for San Diego, 1 less for San Jose

Just what college football needs: another lower level Bowl Game!

edit - added post on page 2 about Silicon Valley Bowl being out for 2005

San Diego close to hosting a second bowl game

http://www.sportsline.com/collegefootball/story/8386169

SAN DIEGO -- Holiday Bowl officials will go before the NCAA on Tuesday to seek certification for a second bowl game in San Diego.
If approved, the game will be played Dec. 22 at Qualcomm Stadium, and likely will be called the Poinsettia Bowl. The Holiday Bowl is scheduled for Dec. 29.

"I'm going in thinking we've got a 50-50 chance," Holiday Bowl executive director Bruce Binkowski said on Thursday. "We're confident, but we don't want to go beyond 50-50. We've got all the pieces in place. We've just got to see what the committee thinks."

Binkowski and other Holiday Bowl officials will make their presentation to the Football Certification Subcommittee in Phoenix.

If the game is approved, it will be sponsored by a local company that Binkowski wouldn't identify. No TV contract has been finalized, but Binkowski expects that the game would be shown nationally.

The Mountain West Conference has pushed hard for a pre-Christmas bowl game in San Diego, to match one of its teams against an at-large team. Binkowski said he's received letters of support from the Western Athletic Conference -- which used to send its champion to the Holiday Bowl -- Conference USA and the Naval Academy.

If approved, the new bowl could take the Mountain West team of its choice, meaning San Diego State could play in a hometown bowl, if eligible. The Aztecs haven't been eligible for postseason play since going to the 1998 Las Vegas Bowl.

"There's the possibility not only of San Diego State, but also for BYU, Wyoming, Colorado State and all those old Holiday Bowl teams to be back," Binkowski said.

BYU played in 11 Holiday Bowls and always was a big draw.

The Holiday Bowl has matched teams from the Pac-10 and Big 12 conferences since 1998. In 1999, BYU, San Diego State and six other teams left the expanded WAC to form the Mountain West Conference.

The new bowl would pay each team close to the old bowl minimum of $750,000. "At this point it's a moving target, but the key is to approach $750,000," Binkowski said.
 
Last edited:
Sweet!!!!

Mountain West versus an at large team! I was a little bummed we couldn't see Wyoming play Western Michigan this year.

All kidding aside, I love bowl games. I watch every bowl game of the year, so one more will just add to my football viewing pleasure.

And I'm glad it has a name that is not a sponsor....yet. Even if the Poinsettia Bowl is a little girly, it's better than the Verizon Family Plan Bowl.
 
Upvote 0
Yertle said:
And I'm glad it has a name that is not a sponsor....yet. Even if the Poinsettia Bowl is a little girly, it's better than the Verizon Family Plan Bowl.
How about the "Can You Hear Me Now? Bowl"
 
Upvote 0
What happens if there aren't enough elligible teams to make up for the all the bowl games? I heard that only one team (Akron) was elligible for a bowl game last year and didn't make it. If there was another bowl game, they'd pick Akron and who?
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
What happens if there aren't enough elligible teams to make up for the all the bowl games? I heard that only one team (Akron) was elligible for a bowl game last year and didn't make it. If there was another bowl game, they'd pick Akron and who?
If that's the case, Akron can go play against themselves in the Cingular Bowl. :tongue2:
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
What happens if there aren't enough elligible teams to make up for the all the bowl games? I heard that only one team (Akron) was elligible for a bowl game last year and didn't make it. If there was another bowl game, they'd pick Akron and who?
Clemson and South Carolina both were 6-5 in 2004 and thus bowl eligible, but both programs withdrew themselves from bowl consideration after they had an ugly on-field brawl in their season ending in-state rivalry game.
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
..........making them inelligible.......
Just pointing out that there were 2 more 1-A teams that had enough wins to go to a bowl game last year, if there hadn't been a rare incident that stopped them from accepting a bid.
 
Upvote 0
Ok.. but the question is the same: what happens if there aren't enough teams to fill up all the bowls? We can say "there'd be 2 more teams this year if not for the ugly incident," but you can't rely on no "ugly incidents" in any given year.

Or, look at it this way: there were 28 bowl games last year. Add one (makes approximately 29), and now you need 58 bowl-elligible teams. Assuming I'm right (which is a stretch, I know) that there were 57 or 59 bowl-elligible teams last year, how do we know there will be 58 this year? Maybe it will be 65, maybe it will be 55. What happens if there aren't enough bowl-elligible teams?
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
Ok.. but the question is the same: what happens if there aren't enough teams to fill up all the bowls? We can say "there'd be 2 more teams this year if not for the ugly incident," but you can't rely on no "ugly incidents" in any given year.

Or, look at it this way: there were 28 bowl games last year. Add one (makes approximately 29), and now you need 58 bowl-elligible teams. Assuming I'm right (which is a stretch, I know) that there were 57 or 59 bowl-elligible teams last year, how do we know there will be 58 this year? Maybe it will be 65, maybe it will be 55. What happens if there aren't enough bowl-elligible teams?
I think that a bowl game would actually get canceled if they didn't have 2 eligible teams to pick from. If they add the 12th game, this becomes very unlikely, since 6-6 teams can go.
 
Upvote 0
BuckeyeBill73 said:
I think that a bowl game would actually get canceled if they didn't have 2 eligible teams to pick from. If they add the 12th game, this becomes very unlikely, since 6-6 teams can go.
Then why wasn't Ohio State elligible in 1999 (I think..)? They were 6-6. I'm not arguing, as I remember a couple years ago Purdue was 6-6 and they went to a bowl (Sun Bowl, maybe?). Anyone know what the difference is/was?
 
Upvote 0
Zurp said:
Then why wasn't Ohio State elligible in 1999 (I think..)? They were 6-6. I'm not arguing, as I remember a couple years ago Purdue was 6-6 and they went to a bowl (Sun Bowl, maybe?). Anyone know what the difference is/was?

Good question, and I don't really know for sure. Could be a lot of things. Maybe there were fewer bowl games that year, thus, fewer teams invited. Maybe OSU finished 5th or worse in the Big Ten and no one thought they deserved an invite.

What year did they implement the "bowl eligible" number of 6 wins?
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top