PlanetFrnd
Head Coach
Interesting blurb on CNN today about a book entitled: Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet and Threatens our Lives
Broadly, the idea of American denialism is something that I thought my interest the Planet, given the varying relgious views expressed here...
The mistrust of science, broadly speaking, is something that is baffling to me.
So is a discussion of genetically enhanced food... so, discuss?
I'll start: The "yuck factor" in genetically enhanced food affects me too, I guess, because I prefer the idea of my food being naturally grown and/or reared. That being said, I at least recognize that its probably irrational most of the time... ok, carry on
Fear of science will kill us - CNN.com
Broadly, the idea of American denialism is something that I thought my interest the Planet, given the varying relgious views expressed here...
The mistrust of science, broadly speaking, is something that is baffling to me.
So is a discussion of genetically enhanced food... so, discuss?
I'll start: The "yuck factor" in genetically enhanced food affects me too, I guess, because I prefer the idea of my food being naturally grown and/or reared. That being said, I at least recognize that its probably irrational most of the time... ok, carry on
Fear of science will kill us - CNN.com
Fear of science will kill us
By Michael Specter, Special to CNN
Editor's note: Michael Specter is a staff writer at The New Yorker and the author of "Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet and Threatens our Lives." TED, a nonprofit organization devoted to "Ideas Worth Spreading," hosts talks on many subjects and makes them available through its Web site, http://www.ted.com/
(CNN) -- American denialism threatens many areas of scientific progress, including the widespread fear of vaccines and the useless trust placed in the vast majority of dietary supplements quickly come to mind.
It doesn't seem to matter how often vaccines are proved safe or supplements are shown to offer nothing of value. When people don't like facts, they ignore them.
Nowhere is that unwillingness to accept the truth more evident than in the mindlessly destructive war that has been raging between the proponents of organic food and those who believe that genetically engineered products must play a role in feeding the growing population of the Earth. This is a divide that shouldn't exist.
All the food we eat -- every grain of rice and kernel of corn -- has been genetically modified. None of it was here before mankind learned to cultivate crops. The question isn't whether our food has been modified, but how.
I wrote "Denialism" because it has become increasingly clear that this struggle threatens progress for us all.
Denialists replace the open-minded skepticism of science with the inflexible certainty of ideological commitment. It isn't hard to find evidence: the ruinous attempts to wish away the human impact on climate change, for example. The signature denialists of our time, of course, are those who refuse to acknowledge the indisputable facts of evolution.
Nowhere has the screaming been louder, however, than in the fight over how we grow our food. If you are brave enough to set a Google Alert for the phrases "genetically modified food" and "organic food," you will quickly see what I mean...
Last edited: