Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
BB73;1404497; said:Yeah, he said "I took a banned substance", but then later acts like he didn't know what he took. If you don't know what you took, A-Rod, how do you know it was a banned substance? During the interview, Gammons should have probed more deeply about what substance A-Rod was admitting to taking.
BB73;1404497; said:Yeah, he said "I took a banned substance", but then later acts like he didn't know what he took. If you don't know what you took, A-Rod, how do you know it was a banned substance? During the interview, Gammons should have probed more deeply about what substance A-Rod was admitting to taking.
DaytonBuck;1404506; said:Often times multimillionaires get divorced to date a gal 17 years their senior who also happens to be the biggest living icon for some this side Liza Minnelli
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1404531; said:Actually, A-Rod's story makes sense.
A) He knows whatever he took was banned, because he tested positive (I can only assume he was informed "You're positive" and not "You're positive for X")
B) In as much as the real illegality of steroids is in terms of possession (Some one feel free to check me on that, I have not scoped out the law specifically) it would be "wise" for a user to be "willfully blind" to whatever his trainer is giving him... 1 - he never possesses it... and 2 - plausible deniability....
Gammons himself says he felt A-Rod was being sincere and was truly emotional about all this... Everyone is free to draw their own conclusions about his "apology" of course, but in terms of damage control, it looks like A-Rod is playing the right cards.
BB73;1404508; said:House rep Elijah Cummings (D-Md) now says that perhaps A-Rod should come testify before Congress,while he's in a "confessing" mode.
That's a bad idea. Congress should be working on other things right now besides another baseball PED circus.
So, if I hire you to kill someone, I'm not to blame for the murder?mooktarr;1404612; said:It all comes down to the players taking banned substances, no one else is to blame.
Buckeyeskickbuttocks;1404488; said:Huh..... that's kinda exactly what A-Rod said. The decision to juice was "forced" on him.....
Anyway, I wasn't suggesting steroids were healthy.... I was suggesting you're not actually interested in the health of baseball players in the same way you're interested in competition (which was your other term).
OH10;1405042; said:The health and competition issues are inseperable. I would guess most players that chose not to use steroids either made that choice a) because they were afraid of the health consequences; b) because they believed it was unfair to other players; or c) both. Most likely both.
MaxBuck;1405044; said:I still wonder about the ethics of using stolen, sealed court documents to support a witch hunt against an unpopular sports celebrity. The "journalists" involved should be prosecuted IMO.
Piney;1405076; said:You bring up the health issue. But if I recall correctly... HGH actually is safe to use. Or at least none of the known consequences that most steriods have. So doesn't HGH kinda throw out your health issue?
Also I could have sworn the steriod that A-Rod was said to have used was one of the more expensive kind because it had minimal health side-affects.