• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025 tOSU Defense Discussion

The total rushing yards factors in the 39 yards lost from sacks. So they actually ran for 93 yards. Still not am immense total but not as anemic as it appears in the box score

ok so 25 on the first carry and then 68 yards the rest of the game. not too shabby
Yeah, holding a team who everyone knew HAD to run the ball in order to be any type of competitive is a great feat in my eyes. The only offensive weapons Ped St had was at the RB position, and they have decent OL as well. Not even getting 100yds bodes well for the future, IMO. But some fans skew towards the negative on a constant
 
Upvote 0
Yeah, holding a team who everyone knew HAD to run the ball in order to be any type of competitive is a great feat in my eyes. The only offensive weapons Ped St had was at the RB position, and they have decent OL as well. Not even getting 100yds bodes well for the future, IMO. But some fans skew towards the negative on a constant

It's the video game mentality. If OSU doesn't win 100-0 and allow negative yardage it sucks. Obvious hyperbole but the point remains. And I still get a twinge of it too while I'm watching the games so I'm not preaching to anybody in particular
 
Upvote 0
Yeah, holding a team who everyone knew HAD to run the ball in order to be any type of competitive is a great feat in my eyes. The only offensive weapons Ped St had was at the RB position, and they have decent OL as well. Not even getting 100yds bodes well for the future, IMO. But some fans skew towards the negative on a constant

If it make anyone feel better, Iowa gave up 173 to them. And Iowa is a top 10 rushing defense, #2 total defense, and #4 scoring defense.

Allar getting hurt actually forced them to develop an identity on offense. Still bad, yes, but they no longer have the luxury of giving Singleton and Allen equal touches. Allen is the clear RB1 and if they had started opperating like this against Oregon, there’s a solid chance they only have 2 losses.

Some fans think the defense is too good to be true. No, they haven’t played an elite offense, but are any P4 offenses that far ahead of everyone else? The metrics are in love with USC and IU, but both have stumbled against the best defenses they’ve played. Georgia, Bama, and Ole Miss look the most dangerous but aren’t any better than Oregon was last year.

They won’t hold everyone under 14 points, but the defense is legit.
 
Upvote 0
During the game, they talked about offensive plays per game. I guess Ohio State tries to play as few plays as possible so they can last longer in the season. I was going to look into that, but found the results not as fun as I had hoped. But here's something interesting:

11/8 - Purdue - 44 offensive plays (Last in the country)
11/1 - Penn Stat - 64 plays (somewhere in the middle)
10/18 - Wisconsin - 49 plays (second to last)
10/11 - Illinois - 75 plays (somewhere in the middle)
10/4 - Minnesota - 52 plays (second to last)
9/27 - Washington - 59 plays (toward the top)
9/13 - Ohio - 59 plays (toward the top)
9/6 - Grambling - Website doesn't keep track of FCS.
8/30 - Texas - 68 plays (somewhere in the middle, but a lot of teams show 1 play or 4 plays that week, which is obviously wrong)

That's just under 59 plays per game on average (not counting Grambling), when the national average seems to be around 68 plays per game.
At 65 points all season, and 478 plays all season, that's 0.136 points per play.

What does that mean? I don't know. But Ohio State offense has 257 points (not counting Grambling), and has 506 plays. That's 0.508 points per play.
 
Upvote 0
During the game, they talked about offensive plays per game. I guess Ohio State tries to play as few plays as possible so they can last longer in the season. I was going to look into that, but found the results not as fun as I had hoped. But here's something interesting:

11/8 - Purdue - 44 offensive plays (Last in the country)
11/1 - Penn Stat - 64 plays (somewhere in the middle)
10/18 - Wisconsin - 49 plays (second to last)
10/11 - Illinois - 75 plays (somewhere in the middle)
10/4 - Minnesota - 52 plays (second to last)
9/27 - Washington - 59 plays (toward the top)
9/13 - Ohio - 59 plays (toward the top)
9/6 - Grambling - Website doesn't keep track of FCS.
8/30 - Texas - 68 plays (somewhere in the middle, but a lot of teams show 1 play or 4 plays that week, which is obviously wrong)

That's just under 59 plays per game on average (not counting Grambling), when the national average seems to be around 68 plays per game.
At 65 points all season, and 478 plays all season, that's 0.136 points per play.

What does that mean? I don't know. But Ohio State offense has 257 points (not counting Grambling), and has 506 plays. That's 0.508 points per play.
The mantra last year was, “Leave no doubt”, this year it’s “Efficiency“. I think it’s working.
 
Upvote 0
Back
Top