Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
They got tired of the "speed" narrative after '02 I think. They can tell themselves we're soft all they want. Once Reese or Downs lays someone out, the play on the field will speak for itself.The miami punks are calling us 'soft.' Typical baseless rhetoric.
If 'soft' means having a prolific offense, suffocating defense, and something they don't have; 'class' I'll take the false accusation of being soft all Day long.
Lesmerises and Landis highlighted that outside of the OL, they are not a physically imposing team and called them ACC tough. That’s their identity in the ACC, let’s see how that works now (and as I noted above, they didn’t impose their will for 55 minutes against a paper tiger overly reliant on blitzing A&M team and had three nice runs on their final drive).They got tired of the "speed" narrative after '02 I think. They can tell themselves we're soft all they want. Once Reese or Downs lays someone out, the play on the field will speak for itself.
On the Xs and Os standpoint. The same coverage that gave the offense fits against IU is something Miami has deployed at times throughout the year.
Like anything else, there's a certain anticipation and expectation to seeing this coverage. Hopefully Day and Co. have armed Julian with as much design and education as possible to combat the looks. Miami will run it until we show proficiency beating it.
How do you combat these looks? Quick pass and/or run at the dropping end?
Non white board?
- Win up front
- Offensive balance
- Run the rock
- 3rd and short situations
Keep these defenses from getting into situations where they can consistently throw complex looks at your QB. IU controlled the LoS quite a bit and the Bucks were routinely in 3rd and 5+
White board?
- Minimize IOL pressure
- Vertical stressors
Put the 1/2 field DBs in conflict. There's a classic concept that I loved watching Peyton Manning use - 4 verts.
Malik Willis threw a TD last week on 4 verts against a cover 2 look with a pressure bluff.
ACC tough. I like that!Lesmerises and Landis highlighted that outside of the OL, they are not a physically imposing team and called them ACC tough. That’s their identity in the ACC, let’s see how that works now (and as I noted above, they didn’t impose their will for 55 minutes against a paper tiger overly reliant on blitzing A&M team and had three nice runs on their final drive).
100 yards for Fletcher is okay in those first 55 minutes, but they resulted in three total points, even with gifted short fields, he wasn’t exactly grinding them when it counted for a vast majority of the game.
The miami punks are calling us 'soft.' Typical baseless rhetoric.
If 'soft' means having a prolific offense, suffocating defense, and something they don't have; 'class' I'll take the false accusation of being soft all Day long.
Exactly why it’s ridiculous that people are like “oh shit Miami has the best OL”.Lesmerises and Landis highlighted that outside of the OL, they are not a physically imposing team and called them ACC tough. That’s their identity in the ACC, let’s see how that works now (and as I noted above, they didn’t impose their will for 55 minutes against a paper tiger overly reliant on blitzing A&M team and had three nice runs on their final drive).
100 yards for Fletcher is okay in those first 55 minutes, but they resulted in three total points, even with gifted short fields, he wasn’t exactly grinding them when it counted for a vast majority of the game.
Lesmerises and Landis highlighted that outside of the OL, they are not a physically imposing team and called them ACC tough. That’s their identity in the ACC, let’s see how that works now (and as I noted above, they didn’t impose their will for 55 minutes against a paper tiger overly reliant on blitzing A&M team and had three nice runs on their final drive).
100 yards for Fletcher is okay in those first 55 minutes, but they resulted in three total points, even with gifted short fields, he wasn’t exactly grinding them when it counted for a vast majority of the game.
Well we know they didn’t look like ACC champions so maybe that’s what he meant.Pate was railing against this narrative recently, adamant that they “don’t look like an ACC team.”
Very curious who is right.