Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you want in the playoffs, it's pretty simple.The Domers want to get in under their own rules: 1. Independent 2. Semi-conferenced 3. No sharing NBC or playoff money with other schools who helped you get there. 4. Play games in every section of the country to help with recruiting. There's no doubt they'd be in the play offs if they had played in the ACC CCG, but they think they're above that. In short, fuck 'em.
Geez, I get tired of the media types like Saban, DiNardo, and others bitching about not getting the ‘12 best teams’. That wasn’t the deal.
They expanded to 12 to get more TV money. They gave the little guys a guaranteed spot for at least 1 of the 5 conference champions, in order to sell it, appear to be more inclusive, and avoid potential litigation. Everybody agreed to that arrangement.
The fact that the ACC never imagined that their CCG winner would be left out, and that they were idiotic enough to have a 5-loss team win a tiebreaker to get into that game, is the ACC’s problem. So that allowed 2 teams not in the top-12 to get in instead of the 1 that would almost always be included.
So if you’re weren‘t in the top-10 you’re out, Those are the breaks, win more games and quit your bitching.
I'm reasonably sure their annual bonuses are dependent on this ...."Best" is a highly subjective matter. If the ESPN personalities had their way we'd have 4 loss SEC teams rolling into the playoff.
Well, the SEC totes the water for ESPN. So naturally, ESPiN wants more SEC teams in. Believe there's five this year, with a 3 loss Bama edging out a 2 loss ND. Still not clear on why the playoff includes one or two "little guys", unless a neat trick to avoid being a monopoly...PS, have you noticed that the ESPN stations do not air many or any of the B10 games or reruns?
I agree that losing in the CCG shouldn’t move a team relative to teams that didn’t play in their CCG.ND should join a conference if they don't want to get left out for 3 loss teams who took their extra loss in a CCG game.
Both losses to the same team, but they get punished for losing the CCG so Miami can get Shawshank sexed in the CFP. If only their name rhymed with slamma.why in the F did BYU get dropped?
All good points, but BYU didn't "just lose" their CCG. They got blown out.I agree that losing in the CCG shouldn’t move a team relative to teams that didn’t play in their CCG.
So why in the F did BYU get dropped? It’s because when Duke became the ACC champ the conference was going to get left out. They decided that the ACC needed to get in and the only way to do that was to get Miami and ND next to each other and the only way to do that was to punish BYU for losing their CCG.
This just confirmed what we already know. The committee decides what they want to do and then finds the reasons for it.
They are (like every other poll) a loss sorter. 0 losses get compared, then 2 losses get compared, then 3 losses get compared. Only difference is an SEC 3 loss CAN be bundled with the 2 loss teams and an ACC or B12 1 loss WILL get bundled with the 2 loss teams. ND is likely a better team than Ole Miss. it’s just ND played 2 good teams and Ole Miss played 1.