• New here? Register here now for access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Plus, stay connected and follow BP on Instagram @buckeyeplanet and Facebook.

2025-2026 Ohio State Men's Basketball

Here's the thing though - that's NEVER been Ohio State historically, until Thad Matta that is. Thad Matta looks evermore like a complete unicorn in this program's history and since we're past 20 years since he was hired, and nearly 10 years since he was let go, the landscape of college basketball has changed entirely but Ohio State is still playing it like it's 2005.

To go full sports dork on you, I assigned a numerical value to every tournament appearance (25 out of 48 seasons if you were wondering and if you count O'Brien's 4 tournament years) from 1978-79 onward. This year was picked as it was the year of the Magic/Bird rivalry and the beginning of the modern era of College Basketball. The tournament expanded in 1985.

Anyway - of those 25 appearances, Matta REALLY stands out as the unicorn I keep saying he was with 9 of the 25 total appearances...I assigned each tournament result a number, from 7 (which is playing in the national final) to 1, which would be playing in but losing a play-in game, which hasn't happened yet. Here are the results:

Eldon Miller - 13
Gary Williams - 3
Randy Ayers - 12
Jim O'Brien - 14
Thad Matta - 40
Chris Holtmann - 11

It was an absolute stroke of luck (or genius) to hire Matta with the sanctions and whatnot that were ongoing at the time. As it is, he's the ONLY coach to elevate this program past its historical mean and he basically got run out of town. Without the Matta era, this program is moribund.

It's not that it can't happen - it's been proven it CAN. Should is another matter entirely. "Should" is earned, not a given. As far as that goes, there isn't a quick fix here - and anyone pretending that a new coach is going to magically fix everything is delusional.

It's going to take time, much increased NIL, a better or at least updated game atmosphere and a bigger national recruiting effort (international as well). All of it is going to take a much more aggressive focus from the AD to get it done.

Let us also remember that at Ohio State, if they are making money, the dog won't bark too loudly. That's just reality. Football is making money for the ENTIRE AD.

FWIW I don't think Diebler gets fired unless they somehow lose the rest of their games this year. I think they give him the 2nd full year (this is the 2nd full year) before putting on the pressure to win now in year 3. That said, if they DO pull the trigger, they cannot miss on the next hire and they absolutely must have a contingency plan (i.e. NOT what Ped State did when they fired Franklin)....and if they DO miss and that coach gets canned in 2 or 3 seasons, that rep of being a coaching graveyard at a football-focused school becomes harder to beat.

How many years for each total? Would like to see Fred Taylor's numbers even though it's before the time frame you chose

Eldon Miller - 13

Gary Williams - 3

Randy Ayers - 12

Jim O'Brien - 14

Thad Matta - 40

Chris Holtmann - 11
 
Upvote 0
How many years for each total? Would like to see Fred Taylor's numbers even though it's before the time frame you chose

Eldon Miller - 13

Gary Williams - 3

Randy Ayers - 12

Jim O'Brien - 14

Thad Matta - 40

Chris Holtmann - 11
Holtmann 6
Matta 13
O'Brien 7
Ayers 8
Williams 3
Miller 8

I'll have to do that tomorrow. Taylor damn near 3-peated and then was meh for most of the rest of his tenure. Miller started slow and got better until they canned him after winning the NIT in 1986....in the timeframe I went from. Miller had only been the coach for 2 years with zero tournament appearances...
 
Upvote 0
Holtmann 6
Matta 13
O'Brien 7
Ayers 8
Williams 3
Miller 8

I'll have to do that tomorrow. Taylor damn near 3-peated and then was meh for most of the rest of his tenure. Miller started slow and got better until they canned him after winning the NIT in 1986....in the timeframe I went from. Miller had only been the coach for 2 years with zero tournament appearances...

Ok about what I thought!
 
Upvote 0
Ok about what I thought!
Fred Taylor - 18 seasons, 25 points (26 if you want to give him 8 for the National Title). Taylor's points came in 5 of the 18 seasons.

Matta is a total unicorn.

With time comes the need for patience. The thing is, after listening to the Common Idiot and SoyBoyTimmy on 97.1 on the way home, I don't think patience is going to happen. Screaming "This is Ohio State, it should ALWAYS be like that" makes for nice soundbytes but it's not reality yet. To get there, you have to build it. It's not built.
 
Upvote 0
Fred Taylor - 18 seasons, 25 points (26 if you want to give him 8 for the National Title). Taylor's points came in 5 of the 18 seasons.

Matta is a total unicorn.

With time comes the need for patience. The thing is, after listening to the Common Idiot and SoyBoyTimmy on 97.1 on the way home, I don't think patience is going to happen. Screaming "This is Ohio State, it should ALWAYS be like that" makes for nice soundbytes but it's not reality yet. To get there, you have to build it. It's not built.
Taylor's (and Miller's) number is skewed low as the tournament didn't expand to 32 teams until 1975 and 64 in 1985.
 
Upvote 0
Taylor's (and Miller's) number is skewed low as the tournament didn't expand to 32 teams until 1975 and 64 in 1985.
ehhh....most of Taylor's seasons were very meh. He's carried by the high placement in the 5 years they were in the tournament (my system probably gives him more points than he should get honestly)....

Miller shouldn't have been fired when he was fired. That said, I started this in 1978-79, Miller had already been the coach for 2 years and neither one of those teams made the tournament. Edit to add: When the tournament expanded to 32 teams, Miller wasn't even the coach yet. He still didn't make the tournament until year 4.

The way I scored this was rewarding the placement of the game. A national final was worth 7 points, etc.

Matta remains the unicorn in Ohio State basketball history. It's not particularly close either.
 
Upvote 0
I gotta say, Ross Bjork's interview that 11W published does not have me very encouraged. Basically, Bjork thinks that simply a slightly larger revenue share allocated to basketball next year and using 3rd party NIL donors more will be sufficient to make up the difference between OSU and the other programs they have to compete with. Not very convincing when you realize that every program is doing the same things and OSU is already well-behind many of their peers.
elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-basketball/2026/02/161522/deep-runs-in-ncaa-tournament-the-standard-for-ohio-state-hoops-ross-bjork-says-but-buckeyes-need-more-roster?PageSpeed=noscript
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I gotta say, Ross Bjork's interview that 11W published does not have me very encouraged. Basically, Bjork thinks that simply a slightly larger revenue share allocated to basketball next year and using 3rd party NIL donors more will be sufficient to make up the difference between OSU and the other programs they have to compete with. Not very convincing when you realize that every program is doing the same things and OSU is already well-behind many of their peers.
elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-basketball/2026/02/161522/deep-runs-in-ncaa-tournament-the-standard-for-ohio-state-hoops-ross-bjork-says-but-buckeyes-need-more-roster?PageSpeed=noscript

The obvious bigger problem with this is that something has to happen to get 3rd party donors interested. The current product is not going to be attracting a ton.
 
Upvote 0
The obvious bigger problem with this is that something has to happen to get 3rd party donors interested. The current product is not going to be attracting a ton.
Yeah, it's like Bjork thinks people/businesses will donate more for NIL for OSU hoops just because the university plans to make an effort to get more deals done. While he may be right in a technical sense such as sheer quantity of deals, it's hard to envision a scenario where the quality of third-party deals, the actual dollar amounts, for men's basketball goes up significantly next season.
 
Upvote 0
Yeah, it's like Bjork thinks people/businesses will donate more for NIL for OSU hoops just because the university plans to make an effort to get more deals done. While he may be right in a technical sense such as sheer quantity of deals, it's hard to envision a scenario where the quality of third-party deals, the actual dollar amounts, for men's basketball goes up significantly next season.

I think everyone needs to come to terms that we are never going to get basketball NIL at the level scUM does. As much as scUM and the DFBIA love to fancy themselves as an elite football program, they are in reality not, so they will gladly shift funds to basketball to win there when they are sputtering out 8/9 win seasons at best in football. We can definitely do better than what we are doing though and be more competitive.
 
Upvote 0
The obvious bigger problem with this is that something has to happen to get 3rd party donors interested. The current product is not going to be attracting a ton.
Couldn’t agree more. The majority of Ohio State fans are not enthusiastic enough about the program to generate enough money to make a material difference. Minor example: When you purchase concessions at the Schott you’re asked if you want to round up for NIL. Me and all of my buddies decline to roundup because the product / fan experience / cost of going to a game is such a turnoff. If the basketball program is depending on fans to help dig this program out nothing is going to change.
 
Upvote 0
Couldn’t agree more. The majority of Ohio State fans are not enthusiastic enough about the program to generate enough money to make a material difference. Minor example: When you purchase concessions at the Schott you’re asked if you want to round up for NIL. Me and all of my buddies decline to roundup because the product / fan experience / cost of going to a game is such a turnoff. If the basketball program is depending on fans to help dig this program out nothing is going to change.
Good point. OSU has been squeezing fans financially as much as they can with all aspects of the gameday experience, and they want to turn to the fans for even more money to fund NIL. Kind of falls flat when you have been taxing people so much that you've ruined the experience, fans have turned away from you and stop coming to most of the games. They want you to spend hundreds, if not thousands, of dollars for season tickets, pay out the nose for parking, pay inflated amounts for unhealthy, mediocre food, at an arena that was designed for making money with concerts to the point that it doesn't work well for basketball, and keep coming back for more even though they couldn't find a way to actually give Diebler enough NIL funds to add top-tier transfers.
 
Back
Top