cincibuck
You kids stay off my lawn!
Tears being shed for the "old" Rose Bowl. https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Rose-Bowl-game-dead-17670394.php
Upvote
0
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Change the uniforms, put it in Ohio Stadium and it looks like Crable's hit on Smith. Runner is out of bounds and the DB lights him up. It was a cheap shot then, it's a cheap shot. now.The targeting call on Bacon #3 from Bowling Green is exactly why the targeting rule needs a long going over.
NMSU QB is breaking down like he's about to put a move on the DB, then starts to give himself up at the last possible second. The refs first mindset is to throw laundry THEN review it.
Turns out, they didn't (rightly) charge the DB with targeting, but he still got a late hit. Which is, again, complete bullshit. Defender is in the act of tackling, offensive player gives himself up too late to prevent additional contact. Needs to be an "oh well", and move the fuck on. When this starts being applied appropriately, QB's will stop playing with fire for the sake of drawing a cheap call.
Tears being shed for the "old" Rose Bowl. https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/openforum/article/Rose-Bowl-game-dead-17670394.php
It mattered to me whether tOSU won a national championship or not in the early to mid-70s. The path had to be winning The Game and going to the Rose Bowl. This was just when things changed to allow multiple Big Ten teams to go to Bowls, and was right after the major polls started having a final NC vote after the bowls were played.It is what it is. Times change, people change. When I was at OSU we chanted "Rose Bowl!" during games. That was the goal - beat TTUN, win the B1G, win the Rose Bowl.
Where the voters put you after those games was secondary. No one was talking about "winning the natty" in those days. But that was almost 40 years ago. It is what it is.
If she’s stroking that long, she’s not dealing with me.
13 pages before any mention of dildos in this thread?I assumed she is practicing on how to warm up a dildo. But yeah, not dealing with me either with those long strokes.
It mattered to me whether tOSU won a national championship or not in the early to mid-70s. The path had to be winning The Game and going to the Rose Bowl. This was just when things changed to allow multiple Big Ten teams to go to Bowls, and was right after the major polls started having a final NC vote after the bowls were played.
I was never big on the ‘special’ quality of the Rose Bowl. I resented the tie-in that required tOSU to play a team from California, usually from LA, in order to win the Natty back then - it led to falling short after the ‘72, ‘74, ‘75, and ‘79 seasons. Sometimes a result in the Sugar, Cotton, or Orange would have assisted or prevented tOSU ending up #1, but I cared about all of those 4 major bowls, and sometimes wished tOSU could have been in a different one. The BCS solved that, and I was generally fine with it, although they would overreact as they tinkered with the formula.
I’m OK with 4 teams in the CFP, but hate the committee and the influence espn has on things. I think the 12-team playoff will seriously diminish the regular season, which has always been the best in any sport.
But the lost prestige of the Rose Bowl? This midwestern kid doesn’t give a damn about it. I’ve witnessed the Buckeyes losing there and winning there, but it’s just another bowl game that happens to have a great sunset late in the game.
It mattered to me whether tOSU won a national championship or not in the early to mid-70s. The path had to be winning The Game and going to the Rose Bowl. This was just when things changed to allow multiple Big Ten teams to go to Bowls, and was right after the major polls started having a final NC vote after the bowls were played.
I was never big on the ‘special’ quality of the Rose Bowl. I resented the tie-in that required tOSU to play a team from California, usually from LA, in order to win the Natty back then - it led to falling short after the ‘72, ‘74, ‘75, and ‘79 seasons. Sometimes a result in the Sugar, Cotton, or Orange would have assisted or prevented tOSU ending up #1, but I cared about all of those 4 major bowls, and sometimes wished tOSU could have been in a different one. The BCS solved that, and I was generally fine with it, although they would overreact as they tinkered with the formula.
I’m OK with 4 teams in the CFP, but hate the committee and the influence espn has on things. I think the 12-team playoff will seriously diminish the regular season, which has always been the best in any sport.
But the lost prestige of the Rose Bowl? This midwestern kid doesn’t give a damn about it. I’ve witnessed the Buckeyes losing there and winning there, but it’s just another bowl game that happens to have a great sunset late in the game.
These games are a good reminder that when I think the Buckeyes are playing “bad football”, there is a whole different level of bad football that exists.
Watching 6-6 teams make losing plays after losing plays - drops, fumbles, coaching decisions, penalties, situational awareness, etc etc. Just awful. Losers. I don’t know how fans of these teams survive but I guess it’s normal to them?
And I’m the biggest sucker for watching. At least this one is tied and entertaining.