Thanks for setting up the bets, '73.
I crack up every year at people who think the only thing wrong with the NCAA tournament is teams like 16-16 Texas and 17-15 Indiana got left out and some mid-majors *GASP* got bids instead. Then we have, it's cool mid-majors get in but dammit don't give them credit for winning a tournament game when they actually win a tournament game.
Mid-majors didn't create this goofy "first four" format. The NCAA did, and it was to get more at-large big boys in without taking away auto bids from the little guys. So they make them play an extra game, play a game 2 days later if they win, but let's not give them credit for it in the record books because what...we're upset Fairleigh Dickinson and Belmont can now claim an NCAA tournament win?
I'd get rid of the "first four" altogether and keep it at 64. But if you play a game there's a winner and a loser. You don't pretend it didn't happen.