2015-16 bowl games

[Jake]

*goes back to Oregon message board*

 

[Systems_id]

Lmao Oregon

This is why you occasionally need to field a defense.

 

[scarletmike]

 

[SEREbuckeye]

Jesus, Patterson sounds like he has a mouth full of marbles when he talks.

 

[Wingate1217]

*goes back to Oregon message board*

Imagine where this team would be without grad transfers...

I think you just saw that.....

 

[Buckeneye]

*goes back to Oregon message board*

Get ready to laugh.

 

[Jake]

Phil Knight will be flying to visit Chip Kelly next week with a blank check.

 

[Dryden]

Hope this off season the competition committee looks at two things:

1. Targeting - I understand the rule and the purpose, but the implementation is terrible since refs will err on the side of calling it because replay can bail them out. Spearing should be spearing, not targeting, so not include the ejection component. Instead of targeting having its own ejection clause, just change it from a PF to an Unsportsmanlike Conduct foul, so any other UC foul gets you ejected.

2. Overtime - If we really care about the kids, why have an overtime rule system that can result in multi-OT games or encourages extending the tie until a further OT when you get the ball first? A game ending in a tie isn't the end of the world. Moving the ball back to the 35 could solve it. Something ...

 

[Saw31]

Yet they beat Stanford.

That's does not compute. I can't remember if I saw that game. If I did, it was on at 2:00 in the fucking morning and I was wasted. LOL.

 

[scarletmike]

Twitter providing some goods after that mess of a game.

 

[AuTX Buckeye]

Btw That snap didn't look low it hit lockie in the stomach

 

[Jake]

Hope this off season the competition committee looks at two things:

1. Targeting - I understand the rule and the purpose, but the implementation is terrible since refs will err on the side of calling it because replay can bail them out. Spearing should be spearing, not targeting, so not include the ejection component.

2. Overtime - If we really care about the kids, why have an overtime rule system that can result in multi-OT games or encourages extending the tie until a further OT when you get the ball first? A game ending in a tie isn't the end of the world. Moving the ball back to the 35 could solve it. Something ...

I'd just make them go for two in the first OT. No kicks.

But yeah, the targeting rule needs scaled back.

 

[Jake]

Btw That snap didn't look low it hit lockie in the stomach

But Lockie sucks about as much as the center, so...

 

[scarletmike]

Meanwhile in the Motel 6 Bowl we have a kicker showcase. 4 FG attempts so far as the only scoring in the 1st quarter.

 

[Wingate1217]

*goes back to Oregon message board*

And we have this little gem

I certainly hope this does not happen but could see some irrational fans make threats against Brenner. Kid totally cost Oregon any chance of winning.