Was there not an undisputed violation of NCAA rules?
Did Coach Tressel know about the tatoos and fail to report same to the AD and the school?
It seems to me that if you're trying to make your program look like one in which there is concern for compliance you don't turn around and reward violators by having them play in a televised event.
As for Adams, Tressel took chances on both the offense and defense with thin numbers in certain positions. He also tailored the scrimmage to compensate for those thin numbers. Take Adams, Posey and Herron out of the picture and he still had lots of ways he could tailor the event, draw a crowd and give the public a look at next year's team.
You can't go ballistic on USC, Notre Dame, Auburn, Tennessee and Alabama and then demand leniency for the Buckeyes. And yeah, there's a big difference between renting houses, buying quarterbacks and selling jerseys, but that has to be sorted out by the prevailing legal system -- in this case the NCAA and it seems to me that whatever you can do between allegations and punishment to make yourself look like you're taking the high road you should do it -- or else you're just like USC.
And yeah, I'm from that era when punishment meted out at school was doubled by the authorities at home.