Buckeye86
I do not choose to discuss it
cbus2005;1459385; said:That is true, but keep in mind Doug Worthington as well as Cam Heyward are both prototype 3-4 ends in terms of size and ability.
but they haven't played the position so my point about experience remains
in my opinion Heyward did not live up to expectations last year after having a break out freshman campaign because they experimented with him at DT, a position that he was not familiar with... he went from dominating the #1 overall pick in the draft on a bull rush to being pretty quiet for an entire year at DT
I think similar things would happen to both DE's if they decided to switch up the scheme to a 3-4, and as you point out, we don't have a prototypical DT ether so they would also have to learn a brand new position even if we did have an ideal candidate to play the position
saying that Gibson knows how to play linebacker is like saying Paulus knows how to play quarterback, they may have been pretty good at it years ago, but they haven't done it in a long time and there is probably going to be a significant adjustment period, is it really worth limiting the effectiveness of your best D-Lineman as he adjusts to a brand new position?
is it worth limiting the effectiveness of every single one of your defensive lineman, which is supposed to be a major strength for the team, just to get one extra linebacker on the field? I think the answer is a resounding no
throw in the fact that the linebackers responsibilities change drastically in the 3-4 and some of our most talented linebackers are having trouble picking up the schemes as it is (see Sabino) as well as our most experienced linebackers losing their experience by having to learn a new system, and the linebackers take a step back from running a 3-4 as well
doing anything to limit the effectiveness of your front seven when you are trying to break in new starting corners is a big time mistake
so like I said, while it may be fun for fans to think about a 3-4 defense in the offseason, any time we spend running it takes away from the time that our defense can practice in it's base formation, which I think would be wasting time
master the 4-3-4 and the 4-2-5 and crush people because you have superior talent, we don't need gimmicks on defense to dominate
(and I realize that the 3-4 is a legitimate defense that many teams, including some of the best defenses in the NFL, run very successfully, but for us it is still a gimmick, if the coaches are serious about it they would need to completely change their recruiting strategy and coaching tactics to make it not a gimmick, which I don't see happening)
Upvote
0