ACC:
W - Syracuse, FSU, ILL 99, Maryland 01, FSU, Oklahoma 03, Va Tech 04, Notre Dame 06
, Ohio State 06, Hawaii
07, Ohio State 07
L - Nebraska, Michigan
, Miami, WVU
There are a lot of weak opponents in that lineup, noticeably easier than the b10 lineup imo. Many of those wins are against some pretty weak "BCS" opponents. ILL 99, MD 01, ND 06, Haw 07, OSU 07 are the obvious ones, others are debatable.
B10:
W - UCLA 98, ATM 98, Stan 99, Bama 99, Miami 02, KSU 03, ND 05, FSU 06,
L - Wash 00, LSU 01, USC 02, USC 03, 04 Texas, UF 06, USC 06, LSU 07, USC 07
How many of the b10 matchups were weak? Nowhere near as many KSU 03's as the SEC list. And there are a LOT less matchups like Miami 02, USC 02, Texas 04, USC 06, 07, etc.
The B10's BCS record was 8-5 heading into 06, but folks like to pretend like the last 2 years and OSU's record vs the SEC prove the long-standing inequality between the conferences. When faced with the actual numbers when they meet, 'scoreboard' or other canned responses appear to dodge the subject. No one argues that UM's collapse has crippled the strength of the conference, but painting it as a long standing problem is where the hyperbole comes in.