I was being facetious.A #20 rating is overrating Michigan? Really? I thought the #4 rating they got prior to 2005 was being overrated, but #20? I think 20 is a fair spot to put Michigan, considering how much they return and the coaching changes that were made for the better IMO. You can move them lower I guess, but not out of the Top 25. Are there really 25 programs out there better than Michigan? I don't think so. There is just no way they go 7-5 again. Only way that'd happen is if they had an even worse injury situation in 2006. They built some quality depth in 2005 with so many young players getting experience, and they only lose 4 guys on offense (Tim Massaqoui, Adam Stenavich, Jason Avant, Matt Lentz) and 4 guys on defense (Pierre Woods, Grant Mason, Pat Massey, Gabe Watson). When you look at some of those player losses to graduation, I don't know if you can even call them losses (*cough*Pat Massey*cough*).
Upvote
0