• Follow us on Twitter @buckeyeplanet and @bp_recruiting, like us on Facebook! Enjoy a post or article, recommend it to others! BP is only as strong as its community, and we only promote by word of mouth, so share away!
  • Consider registering! Fewer and higher quality ads, no emails you don't want, access to all the forums, download game torrents, private messages, polls, Sportsbook, etc. Even if you just want to lurk, there are a lot of good reasons to register!

Game Thread (2004) Game Seven: Indiana - 10/23/04 (W, 4-3/1-3)

Jump to latest Follow Reply
Sort by date Sort by votes
UGABuck said:
So, should there be better spacing then? Like bigger gaps maybe?

I know next to nothing about OL play but it seems bigger gaps make sense for zone blocking.
Click to expand...
Yes, zone blocking should have larger gaps, as it is based upon using a defenders momentum against him, leaving cutback lanes for the running back to use..

It almost seems as we use a hybrid OL scheme.
 
Upvote 0
Play calling

Actually yes I do. We actually ran a counter reverse. Glad to see that. Yes it has been better.

Buckmark1 said:
Don't you think that the playcalling has been better today? Screens have the potential to be big gainers if its unexpected and as little as we've used it, i would guess it may have been unexpected.
Click to expand...
 
Upvote 0
UGABuck said:
So, should there be better spacing then? Like bigger gaps maybe?

I know next to nothing about OL play but it seems bigger gaps make sense for zone blocking.
Click to expand...
Well you want to keep the rush outside-in to establish the pocket...

It was a blown assignment...that is the reason so many young backs do not see PT early. They can run the ball like hell, but there are so many adjustments made at the line and the young backs have trouble picking up the scheme
 
Upvote 0
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top